Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ek_hornbeck

They are both very intelligent women. I don’t like either one of them but to believe they are not both extremely bright strikes me as odd.

What I don’t like about Condi is that she focused on Saddam when he wasn’t a major problem for this country and I believe this played some role in the WTC. No, she is not the prime reason, but she failed in her duties, in my opinion, at that most crucial of times. I know that most here don’t share that opinion.

Hillary is terrible for many reasons, but Condi played a role in one of our worst moments.


154 posted on 08/16/2013 11:50:13 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]


To: sakic
They are both very intelligent women. I don’t like either one of them but to believe they are not both extremely bright strikes me as odd.

Hillary isn't stupid, but she isn't the brilliant super-woman that her supporters make her out to be. She rode to where she is on Bill's coattails, without him, she'd probably still be an obscure lawyer somewhere in Arkansas. Like Obama, her legislative accomplishments in the Senate were virtually nil.

What I don’t like about Condi is that she focused on Saddam when he wasn’t a major problem for this country and I believe this played some role in the WTC. No, she is not the prime reason, but she failed in her duties, in my opinion, at that most crucial of times. I know that most here don’t share that opinion.

I agree that Iraq was in many ways a diversion, a post-9/11 Red Herring by the Bush administration.

155 posted on 08/16/2013 12:31:04 PM PDT by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson