Here:
Posted on 08/17/2013 4:40:04 AM PDT by txrangerette
Link to Breitbart tv
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I ain’t buyin’ Obamacare. Come and get me, assholes.
Hey it’s just a lesser evil. If we elect more of it we’ll get ...
Mire of it.
Here:
Yup. Lets elect more of that. It has worked so well over the past 2 decades.
The Democrats now , with obamacare, control what was once the medical profession. And the pimple faced veneral disease carriers , parasites, traitors, and self hating Whites that voted for him are shrieking with orgasmic glee. And once the Democrtats get the "immigration reform" Act, they will have politically taken control of the Nation.
They already have. With the gull cooperation and assistance of the GOP that so many insist we continue empowering.
I know that they have. I also believe that the Democrats will regain control of the House in ‘14. And from this point in time forward, the only Republican that will win an election is who the Democrats want. We, by the will of a majority of voters, are now a Socialists Nation. Working our way to a Communist Nation. Working our way to a destroyed Nation. All this is with the willing consent of “We the Traitors”.
I believe in “stepping up to the historical moment” and in doing so correctly, not errantly.
Mark Levin is doing an exceptional job of that with his book and commentary calling for a large group of states to convene and take back Constitutional government.
With that call he’s looking at the larger problem we face and responding correctly.
Meanwhile he’s supporting the current call to deFUND obamacare, while remarking on how the “status quo” Republican party of hand-wringer-do-nothings has made itself USELESS to us as our nation is “transformed” and lost to history.
Which is also appropriate for him to be doing.
He fights on all fronts at once. And tries to choose the correct response for each one. The correct response is important - not merely the urge and will to respond. Each historical moment presents its own facts and dynamic to us.
In the 2010 off-year vote, the tea party did absolutely the correct response to those circumstances. In the 2012 presidential vote, the correct response would NOT have been to sit home, refuse to vote, and damn all Republicans. I will tell you, as a proud Texan, IF that had been followed by Texas Republicans and Independents, Barack Obama would have won the state of Texas and its electoral votes would today sit in the Obama column. In fact, Obama would’ve swept the entire country.
It was a terrible dilemma, because of who Obama’s opponent was and especially in light of Romneycare and Obamacare. On another thread I posted that, nevertheless, voting en masse for Elmer Fudd would have been preferable to letting Obama voters have Texas. What a duo of placeholder candidates, eh? Romney and FUDD?? How appropriate...
Bad choices, but the best course in that specific situation was NOT to let Obama take the entire nation into his column. As it was, those who stayed home or voted hopeless candidates instead of choosing between the top two, gave Obama 4 more years and the nation new reason to weep, and to cry out in raging, righteous anger.
By all means, explain finally how it is that electing a pro gay, abortion funding, healthcare/amnesty pushing liberal instead of a a pro gay, abortion funding, healthcare/amnesty pushing liberal benefits America.
In detail. Without excuses.
Good post; we should be openly ridiculing the GOP, not sending them money..
Yup. And there si much to ridicule. Including their supporters who demand that we slit our own throats again and again.
Last time, they waited until the election was close to spout their RINO supporting crap. This time, seeing the growing backlash, they want to get out in front of it. And as we see on this very thread and most like it, the excuses begin, conditioning us to again accept the inevitible GOP RINO. Because the Dem is worse.
Well the dem is always worse. Each new one is Satan and as time goes by their evil only grows. Thing is, same goes for the GOP
So anyone with a brain would stop the bleeding.
Nope. Not the sycophants. They want more capitulation and they want us to adopt yet another layer of situational ethics to empower it.
The supporters are every bit the problem as the RINOS they demand we vote for.
We were set up to lose; the GOP is in cahoots with the gay, muslim, usurper. The last GOP general elections were slapstick, and at the very least demonstrate their inability to read the tea leaves. Dump the consultants, listen to the base, and get rid of the Mccains, Lindsey Graham’s, Rubio’s, and they will win handily..
Watching Rubio push for la raza told me that the GOP in its current for has gone the way of the do-do..
And mark my words, once the amnesty thing ends, one way or the other, Rubio will begin the process of image rehab with ‘conservatives’ saying we have to get over it because, drum roll please, (say it with me folks) The Dems are WORSE!!!”
Place your bets early and win big.
Perry being hailed as a conservative after his TTC/border fence/STD forced vaccines is a pretty good indicator.
After the election.
WHITE HOUSE LIES
I stand with Levin. He has THE ANSWER!
re: “By all means, explain finally how it is that electing a pro gay, abortion funding, healthcare/amnesty pushing liberal instead of a a pro gay, abortion funding, healthcare/amnesty pushing liberal benefits America. In detail. Without excuses.”
You see, you equate Romney with Obama. You equate them as being exactly the same not only in political ideology, but also in degree of commitment to issues you listed. I think that’s an unsound analysis.
Yes, the republican choice sucked, and yes, Romney had some problems in the four areas you mentioned, but you think Romney was as much pro-abortion as Obama (who supported post-birth abortion)?? You think Romney would have pushed the gay agenda, obamacare and amnesty to the same reckless, whole-hearted degree as Obama??
Maybe another question would be: Explain how voting for Romney would have put the country in the same exact or worse position it is now economically, militarily, in our foreign policy, and yes, even morally under B. Obama?
By degree, which candidate demonstrated more respect for our economy, foreign policy, our military readiness, our Constitution and self-government? Romney or Obama?
Voting always involves voting for more good and less evil. One of the two candidates is going to be, by degree closer to what you believe than the other one. Sometimes the better candidate is only 40% or 50% of what you want or 60% of what you want, while the other one is 0 to 2% of what you want.
Which one do you vote for? It’s a no-brainer.
For your question to be valid, as I said previously, you would have to believe that Romney and Obama are EXACTLY the same in belief and degree of commitment to the gay agenda, abortion, socialized medicine, and amnesty.
If you actually believe that then no answer will satisfy you.
My greater concern now is how the republican party seems completely whipped since the election. Excepting for a few republicans who have spoken out, the majority have acted with no backbone at all. It’s as though they think it’s over. Why fight it? Thus, they have not, except on a rare occasion or two, acted as an opposition party.
I think part of the reason is because of the loss of the presidency in 2012. I think everyone thought Obama was going to lose and lose big. He should have. But, Obama’s people (alive and dead, legal and illegal) showed up big time to vote and conservatives didn’t. Now. Here we are.
Are we better off or worse?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.