Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ltc8k6
AFAIK, you don’t use A/P when landing unless you are doing some form of Autoland with ILS, which wouldn’t apply here.

What about autoland using GPS?

A/T would primarily be to maintain the correct landing speed.

The NTSB said they had good steady speed of 161mph, so it appears the autothrottle was working.

If they weren't using GPS, they'd need some way of inputting altitude control based on what they saw from the PAPI while everything else was automated.

64 posted on 08/18/2013 7:22:49 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: Moonman62

18 was only rated for non-precision approaches, which includes GPS.

GPS alone doesn’t give you accurate enough altitudes, iirc.
It just gets you to the runway.

They were using the Localizer as far as I know, and not GPS.


71 posted on 08/18/2013 9:00:54 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

A steady throttle would mean they didn’t do anything after hitting the trees.

One would expect them to initiate a go-around.

Hard to believe they didn’t realize they hit the trees.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takeoff/Go-around_switches


73 posted on 08/18/2013 9:26:29 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson