Replies

Indeed. I know guys all have their faves (I’m a Charvel Superstrat guy ;) but your analogy is a good one.

Chevy of the era were a box. They were very good trucks, but they looked like the crate they shopped in...and they were good for a couple years in the northeast before rust swiss cheezed them. They did great in fry climes though. I mean a 350 chevy is hard to argue with from an overall standpoint.

But the Fords just had a look to them and were tanks. Thick steel bodies and oh those curves. They looked ‘right’ with a Mack Truck hood ornament on them because they ‘looked’ like bulldogs.

The big block chevys edged them in power, barely, but the 460 is no weak sister. NP 205 xfer cases available, C6 or that granny low 4 speed and Danas on the 2/450s (and a 9in on the 150s)...just brutal.

Interiors were good but were TRUCK interiors and worktrucks came with runner ‘carpeting’. No foo foo stuff to be found.

Only bad thing was the emissions crap and the 204 cases on the 4x4s standard full time. But all the trucks of the era were cursed with that. Can’t have it all I guess.

The boxy rustbucket Chevys were the '73 on through '84 ('85 I think on the Suburbans). Really lousy sheet metal. The '67 - '72 Chevys were pretty solid in comparison but I remember in Oregon all of them would rust (and Oregon never used salt on roads).

I had a '67 Chevy Suburban, it was my favorite all time truck. It was a half ton with a 283 and Turbo 400 so the ride was pretty tame all in all but it would carry a load when so tasked. It was still new enough to have had no rust or rattles when I had it, and being just 18 years old it was the designated party wagon because 8 or 9 of us could pile in with our stuff and go just about anywhere.

I was too young to appreciate what I had and I traded it for a 4X4 corn binder money pit. I could drive it anywhere and break it anywhere, sometimes limp home & sometimes spend a night underneath it in the mud then limp home. Always an adventure, whether I wanted one or not from any particular outing.

Yeah, the thing about the Fords is that they had that great groove down the side stamped into the sheetmetal. The Chevys had a crease that went down the side too, but it wasn’t nearly as dramatic. The Chevys actually look really good in the upper trim levels where they’ve got either two-tone paint or a trim strip to accentuate it, but the Fords didn’t need any extra emphasis. They looked good even in the base models with single color paint and no fancy trim. That groove was filled with shadow and stood out and looked like a comet tail or something — very rakish. Plus the Fords had a perfect grill, especially after ‘77 when they updated it slightly. I’m normally a shortbed or stepside kind of guy but for some reason I like the Fords of that era in a longbed.