_________________
______________
One need read no further than the introduction to this missive to understand its goal. The operative focus is strict regulation of civilian possession of firearms by the “central” or national government. This is necessary because “some civilians misuse small arms” by using them illegally or “improperly stor[ing]” them. The document bases this notion of government control of firearms and ammunition on “international law” — an inaccurate interpretation of such body of laws, but one that fits conveniently the U.N.’s agenda.
I thought the kenyaclown signed it on a weekend a while back.
Hold fire until you see the blue of their helmets.
They’re talking about a civil war. The 2’nd amendment is the only thing which lets many of us feel safe enough to go on living in the US at present.
Be done with it and let’s get it on.
Cleaned up my accuracy this weekend with 2” groups on iron sights and less than 1” on my brother’s Luepold.
Don’t recall which on he had but, at least he quit using and bragging about his cheap azz, $199, mil dot. What a piece o crap.
Helped to be competing against each other and shooting from a completley new position. That of resting on your knee and toes off a bench, just so you could properly grip the weapon and get a good sight.
Was tough too. His sight practically sits on the rail. Very annoying as was his stoopit check rest, which sat a bit high as well.
Oh well. His gun, our fun.
Now if we could figure out how to get his rifle to feed properly out of a mag. As it is now, it’s a very expensive bolt action.
I do like his the left hand extension on the bolt carrier. Charging from the left is much easier and more natural.
Would be kewel if I could do that to my M1’s.
The colour of the helmet for them UN fella’s is blue, right?
Same deal every six months it seems. They will have to fight me for them.
Ain’t worried about it.
Bob Barr and sidekick ‘Franklin’ used to do a very funny radio show in Georgia, “Bob Barr’s Laws of the Universe.” UN gun grabbing in the US was an issue even then. These are serial murderers from war-torn AIDS-infested tribal rape death-by-machete wastelands telling folks in Martha’s Vineyard how to behave.
Seems to me that obambi would be committing an impeachable crime, by signing this treaty. No question, in my opinion.
I would like to see articles of impeachment being brought up in the House, while the treaty is debated in the Senate...
The UN only has as much power as we give them. If the US wanted to, it could shut down the UN almost immediately. Therefore, the US government views the UN as a useful tool and supports what they are doing.
Yeah, whatever. Molon labe, baby. It’s time we had this out.
!
_______________________________
The first thing the UN needs to do is start looking for another building in another country to spew their communist propaganda because if this treaty is signed and they try to enforce it, the first thing we do is take over their tower in the sky.
Sign away clown boy
Then come try and fetch them
Gonna find out it will be a whole lot harder than putting ink on paper you marxist goat humper
This UN treaty is simply another milestone showing how much the elites fear armed citizen militias.
I was involved with independent contract work for an Israeli company when the Libyan civil war broke out. The armed Libyan militias in the provinces led the way in overthrowing the dictator Qaddhafi. These militias joined up with Libyan army deserters - the desertion rate was 75% - to create a fighting force that whipped Qaddhafi’s mercenary southern army and his elite guard.
The militia shot or hanged thousands of privileged elitists in Qaddhafi’s regime. This scared the crap out of elitists around the globe. Hillary demanded that the UN charge the militias with crimes against humanity. Of course, nothing came of that.
The fact remains, though, that elitists are very afraid, and this UN treaty will be one in a long list of efforts by the elites to disarm citizens.
The Senate has already warned Barky they will not ratify this POS.
Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the Constitution supersedes international treaties ratified by the United States Senate.