Skip to comments.
[National Geographic Current Issue] Rising Seas [Alarmism]
cover story of the September 2013 National Geographic Magazine ^
| August 2013
| National Geographic
Posted on 08/20/2013 12:58:22 PM PDT by mbarker12474
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
To: TigersEye
a better word would be “examples.” Every story about the rising seas will have photos as does this thread on FR.
41
posted on
08/21/2013 11:46:06 AM PDT
by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
To: elpadre; mbarker12474
I don't want to put words in someone else's mouth but I think the pics on this thread were intended to show that the shorelines they illustrate haven't changed a bit in several decades in spite of the claims of rising sea levels.
Don't fear the FReeper! Let's invite him to comment. lol
42
posted on
08/21/2013 11:52:24 AM PDT
by
TigersEye
("No man left behind" is more than an Army Ranger credo it's the character of America.)
To: mbarker12474
Was given a gift subscription to Nat Geo years ago. Let it expire. I keep getting requests to re-up — they keep going into the shredder.
43
posted on
08/21/2013 12:01:19 PM PDT
by
Polyxene
(Out of the depths I have cried to Thee, O Lord; Lord, hear my voice.)
To: elpadre
The pics I posted of Virginia Beach and Atlantic City illustrate that sea level has NOT changed from the 1950s to today.
My wife went to the beach in AC in the 1970s. I went to the beach in Va Beach in the 1970s. The hotels and the ocean are all in the same place they used to be.
To: TigersEye
I don't want to put words in someone else's mouth but I think the pics on this thread were intended to show that the shorelines they illustrate haven't changed a bit in several decades in spite of the claims of rising sea levels. True. The pics and my personal experience illustrate that the ocean is in the same place it was 50 years ago.
The National Geographic article knowingly confuses storm damage with sea rise damage. Others will confuse erosion damage with sea rise damage (maybe the article does this also).
National Geographic is a politicized, lying, alarmist.
To: mbarker12474
National Geographic is a politicized, lying, alarmist. Let there be no doubt about that! As a kid, in the '60s and '70s, I used to read them cover to cover. Lots of interesting stuff. Since the '80s it has turned into a propaganda rag for the enviro-wacko agenda and other leftist causes.
46
posted on
08/21/2013 12:45:22 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
("No man left behind" is more than an Army Ranger credo it's the character of America.)
To: mbarker12474
Living not too far away, I have often visited OBX, since the 40’s, and the shoreline has changed greatly. However I have always atributed the loss of beach to wave action, especially during noreasters and hurricanes.
47
posted on
08/21/2013 4:10:09 PM PDT
by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson