I’m acknowledging I have not presented my evidence to the public because I am a rebuttal witness. Rebuttal witness testify and present evidence on the day of trial after the custodian of the record testifies the evidence cannot be found or does not exist.
For all you know, the legal representative examined Obama’s short form COLB and decided to end an investigation because he/she believes NBC status is held in perpetuity after place of birth is established. If the case had gone to discovery, the plaintiff could have subpoenaed the State Department’s CLASS records with regard to Obama and his mother. His CLASS records will show if was issued a Certificate of Loss of Nationality or not.
If the State Department denied Obama’s CLASS records exists or cannot be found during discovery, then I can testify as a rebuttal witness as to Obama being issued a Certificate of Naturalization in 1983. Rebuttal witnesses do not publish their evidence before trial because it gives the defendant time and opportunity to obstruct justice.
“I’m acknowledging I have not presented my evidence to the public because I am a rebuttal witness”
__
LOL, I got it. You have concrete evidence of the President’s having executed an Oath of Renunciation — even though no one else has so much has mentioned it and the State Department is on record to the contrary — but you’re saving it for the right moment. You know, the moment when you’re called as a “rebuttal witness”.
And you have a secret plan to end the war.