“So you choose to ignore these facts and demand I publish proprietary, non-public information...”
__
It’s your decision.
But if you’re not willing to show your proof, you’re hardly in a position to grouse when it’s pointed out to you that no proof has been shown.
You must have a reading comprehension problem. I’m more than willing to appear, testify and show evidence of Obama’s 1983 naturalization as a U.S. citizen as a rebuttal witness. The Court ignores a rebuttal witness until the custodian of records has an opportunity to testify on the records in question.
We see this problem with many eligibility cases. The plaintiff demands records production to prove Obama is not eligible. The custodian of the records refuses to comply with a subpoena because compliance violates Obama’s right to privacy. The plaintiff goes online and complains of conspiracy, while Obots say proof of Obama’s ineligibility does not exist.
Proof of Obama’s ineligibility exists at U.S.C.I.S. It is where all Certificate of Naturalizations for naturalized citizens are stored. Like his birth certificate, Obama can fill out a short form and obtain a certified copy of his Certificate of Naturalization. Also, he can waive his right to privacy and post his Certificate of Naturalization online, like his birth certificate.