To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
Can we agree that probably both sides were at fault? He shouldn't have been jogging behind them and they shouldn't have shot him. If the youths perceived the jogger as "following" them, they would have been well within their rights to attack him. If he would have just stayed at home and kept to himself none of this would have happened.
At least this is what I assume my liberal family members argument would be after hearing their defense of St. Trayvon.
16 posted on
08/21/2013 12:49:06 PM PDT by
nitzy
(You can avoid reality but you can't avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.)
To: nitzy
Can we agree that probably both sides were at fault? He shouldn't have been jogging behind them...Except he was jogging alone, and they had to follow him in a car to get close enough to shoot him in the back. But I'll take your sarcasm, anyway...
To: nitzy
Kind of difficult shooting someone IN THE BACK who's following you. 'Sarcasm' heeded.
To: nitzy
Are we to assume your sarc tag is broken?
36 posted on
08/21/2013 1:09:54 PM PDT by
thesearethetimes...
("Courage, is fear that has said its prayers." Dorothy Bernard)
To: nitzy
Obaba’s extended family.....if he had had sons, these would have been them....apple and tree you know.
84 posted on
08/21/2013 9:42:52 PM PDT by
OldArmy52
(The question is not whether Obama ever lies, but whether he ever tells the truth.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson