Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ghost of SVR4

Well if a fire or another earthquake happened before the fuel rods are removed certainly it would be a situation of extreme
danger that could possibly render a large area of Northern Japan uninhabitable. Even if the ground continues to sink, which it is expected to, the entire structure could collapse, which would fully drain the cooling pool and cause a catastrophic meltdown. It would be disaster of unprecedented magnitude.


16 posted on 08/22/2013 9:31:30 AM PDT by erlayman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: erlayman

If I woke up to a terminal cancer illness and only had 6 months to live I think I would volunteer to help clean up fukishima...

Maybe the radiation would cure my cancer....

It would be a better chance than Obama care...


19 posted on 08/22/2013 10:12:09 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: erlayman

Building nuclear plants in Japan was logical for a country that had to import just about every drop of fuel it used.

Building nuclear plants in Japan, one of the seismic active zones in the world, was danger in the extreme and bordering on the insane.

Building nuclear plants in seismic Japan close enough to the sea for destruction by a tsunami was criminal negligence.


22 posted on 08/22/2013 7:35:27 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson