Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rarestia

The Federal Government is not going to allow a manufacturer to sell something they can’t hack. That is just a fact in 2013.


21 posted on 08/22/2013 8:46:33 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: DManA

It’s technologically impossible. The IT Security industry RELIES on the defensible nature of technology. It’s why large corporations like Google are getting nervous with the Feds asking for their salt and hash algorithms.

Realize if ANY of the Class A certification authorities gave into the government, the ENTIRE cryptography industry would crumble. There’s a reason certification authorities pride themselves on trust. If any of them are cracked or hacked, they lose everything. Entrust, Thawte, Verisign: they ALL rely on the stability of their encryption algorithms.

I’ve studied cryptography for over a decade. The conspiracy theorists may be partially correct with pre-configured chipsets such as those in Cisco network hardware, but when it comes to certificates, VPN, and things like TPMs, the managers and “key holders” MUST be trustworthy or their entire network of trust collapses.


30 posted on 08/22/2013 8:51:28 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: DManA
The Federal Government is not going to allow a manufacturer to sell something they can’t hack. That is just a fact in 2013.

And the PLA is not going to allow a Chinese fab to make chips without a back door, either.

52 posted on 08/22/2013 9:26:41 AM PDT by null and void (Frequent terrorist attacks OR endless government snooping and oppression? We can have both!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson