Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UVa eliminates health insurance for working spouses of employees
Roanoke Times ^ | 8/22/13 | Derek Quizon

Posted on 08/22/2013 5:43:21 PM PDT by randita

UVa eliminates health insurance for working spouses of employees

Coverage will end Jan. 1 in a move that officials hope will save “millions of dollars.” by DEREK QUIZON |

The (Charlottesville) Daily Progress

Thursday, August 22, 2013

CHARLOTTESVILLE — The University of Virginia will no longer provide insurance coverage to the working spouses of its employees, a move university officials hope will save “millions of dollars.”

Starting Jan. 1, employee spouses who have health insurance coverage under their employers cannot get coverage under UVa’s plan. If the spouse is covered under a plan defined by the Affordable Care Act as “minimum value” and “affordable,” he or she will no longer be eligible.

Cutting off working spouses with access to health insurance is part of the university’s plan to save money in the long-term, said UVa spokesman McGregor McCance. If employees wish to keep their spouses enrolled, they must certify their spouses do not have access to health care coverage with their current employer during open enrollment, between Oct. 7 and Oct. 25. If both spouses are employed with the university, they both keep their coverage.

Coverage for children and stepchildren will not change. How many employees and spouses will be affected by the change will not be certain until after the open enrollment procedure, McCance said.

Officials said the move is necessary to rein in growing medical costs and allow the university to focus on preventive care for its employees.

Total medical claims grew 28 percent, from $99 million to $127 million, between 2008 and 2012. This year, administrators expect costs to rise about 6.8 percent. The implementation of the Affordable Care Act will cost the university about $7 million in 2014, and by 2018, the university will have to pay a 40 percent tax on its individual premium plans, officials said in a news release.

The university is also requiring employees to complete an online health survey and sign up for a health screening by Oct. 31 to avoid an increase in premiums.

Employees can submit lab results from their doctors, taken anytime between Jan. 1 and Oct. 31 of this year, in lieu of the screening, according to the release. Susan Carkeek , the university’s chief human resources officer, said the assessment is to identify long-term trends and common health risks. The university, she said, “will only use aggregated data with no employee names. These data help us identify trends and guide our wellness efforts.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: 0carenightmare; bhohealthcare; democrats; obama; obamacare; pelosi; spouses; uva
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
The university is also requiring employees to complete an online health survey and sign up for a health screening by Oct. 31 to avoid an increase in premiums.

My bet is that 75%+ of UVa employees voted for Obama so I'm sure they'll be absolutely DELIGHTED with the changes wrought by Obamacare.

1 posted on 08/22/2013 5:43:21 PM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

VA ping


2 posted on 08/22/2013 5:43:58 PM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita
And, so it begins. First, UPS. Now, UVa.

How's that hopey changey stuff working for ya?
Sarah Palin

3 posted on 08/22/2013 5:46:10 PM PDT by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs stay silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: randita

“My bet is that 75%+ of UVa employees voted for Obama so I’m sure they’ll be absolutely DELIGHTED with the changes wrought by Obamacare.”

The only thing “conservative” about the above statement is the number - I’d put it at 90%.


4 posted on 08/22/2013 5:48:15 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita
The University of Virginia is a public research university in Charlottesville....

So all employees there are paid by the government of Virginia and now they are going to be screwed by  Federal Gov't employees just a few miles away in Washington DC

5 posted on 08/22/2013 5:49:16 PM PDT by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita
“will only use aggregated data with no employee names. These data help us identify trends and guide our wellness efforts.”

Righttttttttt!

6 posted on 08/22/2013 6:03:05 PM PDT by justrepublican (Screaming a "Vexatious requester" at a Wellstone memorial...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita

WE TOLD YOU SO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


7 posted on 08/22/2013 6:03:37 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

99%


8 posted on 08/22/2013 6:04:02 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: randita

another way libs wage war on married couples.


9 posted on 08/22/2013 6:04:15 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita

“”If the spouse is covered under a plan defined by the Affordable Care Act as “minimum value” and “affordable,” he or she will no longer be eligible.””

And just how many people and how many man hours will it take to determine that? May have to hire a bunch of new employees that will cost more in salary than the insurance premium for the spouse. Great thinking!


10 posted on 08/22/2013 6:07:05 PM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita

When spouses have to go out and buy their own insurance it may be better to just quit and become a House wife.


11 posted on 08/22/2013 6:08:17 PM PDT by Venturer ( cowardice posturing as tolerance =political correctness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long
First, UPS. Now, UVa.

Delta Airlines has been mentioned as likely

12 posted on 08/22/2013 6:08:45 PM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory, and He will not be mocked! Blessed be the Name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: randita

A thought just crossed my mind. All the homosexual spouses who have fought for a long time so they can be put on their fruit partners insurance just got screwed.


13 posted on 08/22/2013 6:09:46 PM PDT by Venturer ( cowardice posturing as tolerance =political correctness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita

I don’t see the problem here. If an employee’s spouse gets health insurance from her job, why should her hubby’s insurance provide redundent coverage?


14 posted on 08/22/2013 6:14:06 PM PDT by be-baw (still seeking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
When spouses have to go out and buy their own insurance it may be better to just quit and become a House wife.

Hee hee....unintended consequence...0bammy's policies produce more stay at home moms. Tables turned...we should never let an "0" crisis go to waste.

15 posted on 08/22/2013 6:16:41 PM PDT by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs stay silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: randita

A blind follower cousin of mine worked there a few years ago. The wun can do no wrong in his eyes.


16 posted on 08/22/2013 6:20:41 PM PDT by wally_bert (There are no winners in a game of losers. I'm Tommy Joyce, welcome to the Oriental Lounge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush
And just how many people and how many man hours will it take to determine that?

Pretty easy to implement I'd think.

You cancel all the spousal coverage.

And put the burden of proof on the employee to bring in tax returns showing no W-2s for the spouse.

If there are W-2s, employee must produce an affadavit from that employer verifying no coverage available.

17 posted on 08/22/2013 6:23:08 PM PDT by nascarnation (Democrats control the Presidency, Senate, and Media. It's an uphill climb....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sleepy_hollow; Mad Dawg; EDINVA; JPG; Hawthorn; Paisan; ConservativeOrBust; VA_Gentleman; ...

ping


18 posted on 08/22/2013 6:25:33 PM PDT by Perdogg (Cruz-Paul 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

WoW!!! Do you ever have a way with words!!! (grin)


19 posted on 08/22/2013 6:56:14 PM PDT by SierraWasp (I pledge to the USSA & 2 the democrazy for witch it stands, a nation with liberalism & misery 4 all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: randita

U.Va. will use the savings to post more signs in Spanish in it’s hospital complex!


20 posted on 08/22/2013 7:00:23 PM PDT by padeye66 (http://inventors.about.com/library/inventors/blmailus2b.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson