LOL. Gotcha covered, bud. You’re a ranting maniac antinuker.
It sounds to me like you get your information at sites like this:
http://allreactorsleakallthetime.com/category/fukushima-2/
I suspect that BIER VII is to radiation science as ICCC18 (or whatever the number of the upcoming document is) is to “climate change”.
Rant, rant, rant......it’s what you do. But ask you to provide even a single actual piece of real data, and you dodge, dodge, dodge.
Oh, and the professor who taught my health physics courses thought Gofman was a ranting nutcase.
You refuse to enlighten us with your credentials. You refuse to point to even a single piece of science (all I asked for originally was what was the AMOUNT of radioactivity in those 13 (or 15, or whatever) fish samples).
Not gonna waste any more time with you......I’ve got real world work to do.
Wow! You are very defensive about that hormesis stance aren’t you?
The BEIR VII is state of the art medical research, but if it says something you don’t like, ridicule it as pop science while you defend...hormesis.
Yeah the pro nuke pimps can’t actually disprove Gofman’s work but they REALLY insist he’s insane. No science behind their rants. So medical research = maniac but your hormesis theory is...what?
Yeah I got your number too, not wasting more time on ya.