Words strung together with zero real meaning.
Full scale studies need doing. Who knows what happens to young fish that swim through pockets of higher radiation. While it wouldn't pose that grave of a danger to us, it could decimate fishing stocks. Not saying it is, or that the radiation is what's causing the historical lows in fish populations in the northern pacific, just saying it needs some serious looking into.
True what you say - but this should be something that can be scientifically proven one way or the other whether the fish are contaminated on the west coast of the US - right?