Not much room in the Anglo-French mouton volant for kraut-eaters.
IF Syria were harming Israel or the US, I’d be behind it.....as of now....NO FREAKING WAY!!!!
A beacon of sanity from Europe.
It looks as though we’re in for another war-of-choice for a better, more unified and fair world. It worked out so well in Libya.
How about anti-ship missiles, not to mention a Russian torpedo, if Russia wants to really make a point.
So, we helped the rebels get chemical weapons and Benghazi was a trading post. The WMD’s probably came from Saddam Hussein.
We told the rebels to kill a bunch of innocents right when the UN inspectors showed up and to blame the Syrian government. That “crossed the red line” and allowed BHO to strike Assad, thus helping the rebels to take over Syria.
The stuff in Egypt is off-script.
Am I getting this right?
It’s nice to know that 91% of the American people agree with Europe’s most successful leader, Angela Merkel of Germany, that the west should not attack Syria with missiles.
What would the outcome of such attacks be except more civilian casualties on top of the ones caused by the chemical-weapons that we’re supposed be hysterically angry about?
What part of “following France into war” does not sound like a bad idea?
The POS does not have an honest bone in his body.
Smart move.
Ich verstehe.
Post WWII Germany is generally averse to war, as a matter of principle.
To begin with, the victorious allies imposed that on Germany, and they came to adopt it themselves.
Not much room in the Anglo-French mouton volant for kraut-eaters.
Germany’s probably still a little sore after the whoppin’ they took from Russia in the previous World War.