Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

1800 millisieverts per hour? It just got real serious.
1 posted on 09/01/2013 7:10:12 AM PDT by winoneforthegipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Errant

You will want to read this...


2 posted on 09/01/2013 7:10:46 AM PDT by winoneforthegipper ("If you can't ride two horses at once, you probably shouldn't be in the circus" - SP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: winoneforthegipper

8 posted on 09/01/2013 7:33:18 AM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: winoneforthegipper

just effing great


20 posted on 09/01/2013 7:57:50 AM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: winoneforthegipper

How much water is there?

What is the half-life of the material?


22 posted on 09/01/2013 8:06:55 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: winoneforthegipper; flaglady47; mickie; seekthetruth; Chigirl 26; hoosiermama; Maine Mariner
Where is Algore, the Sierra Club and all the usual globull-warming shills on this?

Sitting in the counting-house counting all their carbon footprint money?

Leni

31 posted on 09/01/2013 8:48:50 AM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: winoneforthegipper

Stumbled on a show online (Bob Tusken) where he was interviewing a man with a background in nuclear power plants.

He said the frightening thing was that the Japanese are continuing to flood the area of the rods with water and that’s making a soup out of the earth underneath the reactor, making it incredibly unstable.

He said robotics would be only way to withdraw the rods and said the Japanese are desperate for international help.

Personally, I think all the “elites” have their bunkers and food supplies to run to—the rest of us are on our own.

Hasn’t Benghazi Barry built a new bunker underneath the White House? Why?


44 posted on 09/01/2013 10:28:39 AM PDT by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: winoneforthegipper; Errant

You guys have a Fukushima ping list? If yes, may I request to be on it? :)


56 posted on 09/01/2013 11:30:55 AM PDT by machogirl (First they came for my tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: winoneforthegipper

I predicted this would happen. The whole event has been handled shabbily since the beginning, both by the Japanese government and the operators of the plant.

God help all the innocent people. They deserve better.


125 posted on 09/02/2013 2:46:32 PM PDT by miserare (Fire Eric Holder!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: winoneforthegipper; nuconvert; Errant; SunkenCiv; gandalftb
How come that journalist have problems in writing about nuclear physics? Do they want to lie and scare people?

I add some lines from Atomic insights:

The latest media discovery was that the reading that was initially reported as 100 mSv/hour was really 1,800 mSv/hour because the detector that produced the 100 mSv/hour reading had a range that maxed out at 100 mSv/hour. What few, if any, media reports include is an explanation that the measured dose rate is nearly 100% beta radiation and that it was measured at a distance of just 70 micrometers from the radioactive material. Beta radiation can be shielded by a single sheet of paper and will only travel about 1-2 meters in dry air.

Someone needs to help journalists understand that there is no way that a beta-emitting radiation source can cause a deadly dose to a human being unless it is ingested in a concentrated form. Even if it is in direct contact, about the worst it can do is cause a skin burn; I would also not recommend using water contaminated with a beta emitter for eye wash. I suppose I have volunteered for that educational task.
As some of the more informative initial reports stated, the gamma radiation from the leaked water measured 1.5 mSv/hour. That number is still valid; it was well within the accurate measuring range of the instrument used.

http://atomicinsights.com/another-update-highly-radioactive-water-leaks-fukushima/

read as well
http://japandailypress.com/nra-chief-says-situation-at-fukushima-exaggerated-0535399/

254 posted on 09/06/2013 1:23:10 PM PDT by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson