Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kevcol

No afros? That’s the most idiotic thing I’ve heard in some time.


34 posted on 09/05/2013 11:54:33 AM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gdani

Seems to me that since they specified afros and dredlocks, styles common to the african-american community, that they have expressed a racial motive in their dress code.

They did also ban mohawks, but the mohawks actually shaved one side of their head, and grew their hair long on the other side. It was the Mohicans who grew their hair longer in the middle and shaved the sides.

Because they seem to be just culturally ignorant, they probably have no ill will and just made a mistake. This is an opportunity to correct their mistake.


57 posted on 09/05/2013 1:03:26 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: gdani

Does no afros mean they have to relax/straighten/iron their hair? And I would be interested to see the restrictions on braids. Is one or two braids allowed? And if so, are variations like French braids or a Heidi braid allowed? Those too are ethnic hairstyles.


65 posted on 09/05/2013 1:41:22 PM PDT by Burkean (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson