Skip to comments.Mounting evidence raises questions about Syrian chemical weapon attack
Posted on 09/05/2013 6:49:43 PM PDT by annalex
Special to WorldTribune.com
Yossef Bodansky, Senior Editor, GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs
There is a growing volume of new evidence from numerous sources in the Middle East mostly affiliated with the Syrian opposition and its sponsors and supporters which makes a very strong case, based on solid circumstantial evidence, that the Aug. 21 chemical strike in the Damascus suburbs was indeed a premeditated provocation by the Syrian opposition.
The extent of U.S. foreknowledge of this provocation needs further investigation because available data puts the horror of the Barack Obama White House in a different and disturbing light.
See: Sarajevo, 1995 and Damascus, 2013: The use of mass attack deception to decide wars
On Aug. 13-14, Western-sponsored opposition forces in Turkey started advance preparations for a major and irregular military surge. Initial meetings between senior opposition military commanders and representatives of Qatari, Turkish, and U.S. Intelligence [Mukhabarat Amriki] took place at the converted Turkish military garrison in Antakya, Hatay Province, used as the command center and headquarters of the Free Syrian Army (FSA) and their foreign sponsors. Very senior opposition commanders who had arrived from Istanbul briefed the regional commanders of an imminent escalation in the fighting due to a war-changing development which would, in turn, lead to a U.S.-led bombing of Syria.
The opposition forces had to quickly prepare their forces for exploiting the U.S.-led bombing in order to march on Damascus and topple the Bashar al-Assad government, the senior commanders explained. The Qatari and Turkish intelligence officials assured the Syrian regional commanders that they would be provided with plenty of weapons for the coming offensive.
Indeed, unprecedented weapons distribution started in all opposition camps in Hatay Province on Aug. 21-23. In the Reyhanli area alone, opposition forces received well in excess of 400 tons of weapons, mainly anti-aircraft weaponry from shoulder-fired missiles to ammunition for light-guns and machine guns. The weapons were distributed from storehouses controlled by Qatari and Turkish Intelligence under the tight supervision of U.S. Intelligence.
These weapons were loaded on more than 20 trailer-trucks which crossed into northern Syria and distributed the weapons to several depots. Followup weapon shipments, also several hundred tons, took place over the weekend of Aug. 24-25, and included mainly sophisticated anti-tank guided missiles and rockets. Opposition officials in Hatay said that these weapon shipments were the biggest they had received since the beginning of the turmoil more than two years ago. The deliveries from Hatay went to all the rebel forces operating in the Idlibto-Aleppo area, including the Al Qaida affiliated jihadists (who constitute the largest rebel forces in the area).
Several senior officials from both the Syrian opposition and sponsoring Arab states stressed that these weapon deliveries were specifically in anticipation for exploiting the impact of imminent bombing of Syria by the U.S. and the Western allies. The latest strategy formulation and coordination meetings took place on Aug. 26. The political coordination meeting took place in Istanbul and was attended by U.S. Amb. Robert Ford.
More important were the military and operational coordination meetings at the Antakya garrison. Senior Turkish, Qatari, and U.S. Intelligence officials attended in addition to the Syrian senior (opposition) commanders. The Syrians were informed that bombing would start in a few days. The opposition was told in clear terms that action to deter further use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime could come as early as in the next few days, a Syrian participant in the meeting said. Another Syrian participant said that he was convinced U.S. bombing was scheduled to begin on Thursday, Aug. 29. Several participants both Syrian and Arab stressed that the assurances of forthcoming bombing were most explicit even as formally Obama is still undecided.
The descriptions of these meetings raise the question of the extent of foreknowledge of U.S. intelligence, and therefore, the Obama White House. All the sources consulted both Syrian and Arab stressed that officials of the Mukhabarat Amriki actively participated in the meetings and briefings in Turkey. Therefore, at the very least, they should have known that the opposition leaders were anticipating a war-changing development: that is, a dramatic event which would provoke a U.S.-led military intervention.
The mere fact that weapon storage sites under the tight supervision of U.S. intelligence were opened up and about a thousand tons of high-quality weapons were distributed to the opposition indicates that U.S. intelligence anticipated such a provocation and the opportunity for the Syrian opposition to exploit the impact of the ensuing U.S. and allied bombing. Hence, even if the Obama White House did not know in advance of the chemical provocation, they should have concluded, or at the very least suspected, that the chemical attack was most likely the war-changing development anticipated by the opposition leaders as provocation of U.S.-led bombing. Under such circumstances, the Obama White House should have refrained from rushing head-on to accuse Assads Damascus and threaten retaliation, thus making the Obama White House at the very least complicit after the act.
Meanwhile, additional data from Damascus about the actual chemical attack increases the doubts about Washingtons version of events. Immediately after the attack, three hospitals of Doctors Without Borders (MSF: médecins sans frontières) in the greater Damascus area treated more than 3,600 Syrians affected by the chemical attack, and 355 of them died. MSF performed tests on the vast majority of those treated.
MSF director of operations Bart Janssens summed up the findings: MSF can neither scientifically confirm the cause of these symptoms nor establish who is responsible for the attack. However, the reported symptoms of the patients, in addition to the epidemiological pattern of the events characterized by the massive influx of patients in a short period of time, the origin of the patients, and the contamination of medical and first aid workers strongly indicate mass exposure to a neurotoxic agent. Simply put, even after testing some 3,600 patients, MSF failed to confirm that sarin was the cause of the injuries. According to MSF, the cause could have been nerve agents like sarin, concentrated riot control gas, or even high-concentration pesticides. Moreover, opposition reports that there was distinct stench during the attack suggest that it could have come from the kitchen sarin used by jihadist groups (as distinct from the odorless military-type sarin) or improvised agents like pesticides.
Some of the evidence touted by the Obama White House is questionable at best.
A small incident in Beirut raises big questions. A day after the chemical attack, Lebanese fixers working for the Mukhabarat Amriki succeeded to convince a Syrian male who claimed to have been injured in the chemical attack to seek medical aid in Beirut in return for a hefty sum that would effectively settle him for life. The man was put into an ambulance and transferred overnight to the Farhat Hospital in Jib Janine, Beirut. The Obama White House immediately leaked friendly media that the Lebanese Red Cross announced that test results found traces of sarin gas in his blood. However, this was news to Lebanese intelligence and Red Cross officials. According to senior intelligence officials, Red Cross Operations Director George Kettaneh told [them] that the injured Syrian fled the hospital before doctors were able to test for traces of toxic gas in his blood. Apparently, the patient declared that he had recovered from his nausea and no longer needed medical treatment. The Lebanese security forces are still searching for the Syrian patient and his honorarium.
On Aug. 24, Syrian Commando forces acted on intelligence about the possible perpetrators of the chemical attack and raided a cluster of rebel tunnels in the Damascus suburb of Jobar. Canisters of toxic material were hit in the fierce fire-fight as several Syrian soldiers suffered from suffocation and some of the injured are in a critical condition.
The Commando eventually seized an opposition warehouse containing barrels full of chemicals required for mixing kitchen sarin, laboratory equipment, as well as a large number of protective masks. The Syrian Commando also captured several improvised explosive devices, RPG rounds, and mortar shells. The same day, at least four HizbAllah fighters operating in Damascus near Ghouta were hit by chemical agents at the very same time the Syrian Commando unit was hit while searching a group of rebel tunnels in Jobar.
Both the Syrian and the HizbAllah forces were acting on intelligence information about the real perpetrators of the chemical attack. Damascus told Moscow the Syrian troops were hit by some form of a nerve agent and sent samples (blood, tissues, and soil) and captured equipment to Russia.
Several Syrian leaders, many of whom are not Bashar al-Assad supporters and are even his sworn enemies, are now convinced that the Syrian opposition is responsible for the Aug. 21, chemical attack in the Damascus area in order to provoke the U.S. and the allies into bombing Assads Syria. Most explicit and eloquent is Saleh Muslim, the head of the Kurdish Democratic Union Party (PYD) which has been fighting the Syrian Government.
Muslim doubts Assad would have used chemical weapons when he was winning the civil war.
The regime in Syria has chemical weapons, but they wouldnt use them around Damascus, five km from the [UN] committee which is investigating chemical weapons. Of course they are not so stupid as to do so, Muslim told Reuters on Aug. 27. He believes the attack was aimed at framing Assad and provoking an international reaction. Muslim is convinced that some other sides who want to blame the Syrian regime, who want to show them as guilty and then see action is responsible for the chemical attack. The U.S. was exploiting the attack to further its own anti-Assad policies and should the UN inspectors find evidence that the rebels were behind the attack, then everybody would forget it, Muslim shrugged. Who is the side who would be punished? Are they are going to punish the Emir of Qatar or the King of Saudi Arabia, or Mr Erdogan of Turkey?
And there remain the questions: Given the extent of the involvement of the Mukhabarat Amriki in opposition activities, how is it that U.S. intelligence did not know in advance about the oppositions planned use of chemical weapons in Damascus?
And if they did know and warned the Obama White House, why then the sanctimonious rush to blame the Assad Administration? Moreover, how can the Obama Administration continue to support and seek to empower the opposition which had just intentionally killed some 1,300 innocent civilians in order to provoke a U.S. military intervention?
If you want to be on this right wing, monarchy, paleolibertarianism and nationalism ping list, but are not, please let me know. If you are on it and want to be off, also let me know.
As is sometimes the case, I have a few articles from lesser known sources; this time, on the topic of the day.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out. Looks like obama will have to capitulate. This administration has destroyed what little trust I had in government.
A false flag ruse? The Islamists .... and our Obamanists,
Lying? The muslims? How can this be? This is shocking.
Lies about Benghazi, lies about Syria. Ok, NOW can we impeach this guy? Oh of course not, that would be racist.
It’s just amazing how these people can lie so effortlessly. Kerry says Clinton’s intelligence that Saddam had WMDs was accurate. But Bush’s intelligence was not only wrong, it was a lie. Now we’re supposed to believe it when he says obama’s intelligence is accurate.
-——the impact of imminent bombing of Syria by the U.S. and the Western allies———
It would appear that Obama got cold feet and in a chickenshit manner, in a cold sweat, couldn’t summon the courage to pull the trigger.
Important in the sentence is the phrase western allies. Extensive words clearly include the allies in the planning and operations. All this is lost in the hysteria about AQ is coming, AQ is coming. One can surmise the allies are disgusted with an Obama that gets cold feet and backs out. The adults are in control operationally from Turkey and the AQ and MB hype is just that. Hype
The article never states who was gased and the motive or operational objective for making a gas attack. We know people are dead but don’t know who not the possible reason for the attack.
I am not sure we are supposed anything. Obama will plow through regardless of the popular opposition to the war in any country, including ours, which will do the attack. Sadly, the congress may not be far behind in their support for the new war, because the economic news are not good and they need a distraction.
Yes we do know that. For Assad the reason would be to risk a retaliation against his military capability to demonstrate that the West would chicken out. That is an idiotic strategy for Assad since he had no difficulty punishing the rebels with conventional means and is on the verge of driving them out. However, if you want to believe like Kerry and Obama and those fops in Europe do, that it is Assad responsible, yeah, that's the reason -- there is no other.
For the rebels the reason is to get the US and NATO finally drawn into the Syrian civil war on their side. It became clear that unless WMD is used, no one will do anything, so they used it. That is their "possible reason".