Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

Interestingly, if he had acted quickly on Benghazi he would appeared “tough”, and he could have done it without Congress.

I guess the Vegas fundraiser was more important at the time...


41 posted on 09/06/2013 7:41:36 AM PDT by az_gila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: az_gila
He did not act on Benghazi and he will not do anything in Syria without congress authorizing. The question is, why?

We are beginning to see a pattern that will continue with Obama. He will not take military action and the reason is simple. He is afraid someone in the military will again challenge his eligibility as Commander N Chief as they have done before. The big difference now is the White House has since released a known fraudulent birth certificate the the evidence is there to prove it. They are afraid Sheriff Joe would be on the witness list for the defense, and he most certainly would.

In the end I think the Republicans will cover for Obama and authorize some sort of action in Syria. The Republicans have through their own inaction committed themselves to backing Obama.

52 posted on 09/06/2013 8:42:19 AM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson