Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

It makes some business sense for the following reasons:

-Kmart offers layaway chain wide. Walmart allows individual store managers to decide whether they want the hassle (which most of them do not). So there is some competitive advantage.

-Good way to sell to people short on money in a tough economy (it boomed back in the 70’s).

-Kmart captures their cash in the layaway payments. So they get to invest that money for a time even if the customer ultimately cancels. Plus that’s less they can spend at the competition.

-As many here have pointed out, Kmart has become decidedly downscale, and layaway is a proven winner with this crowd.


28 posted on 09/12/2013 1:18:40 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Buckeye McFrog

K-Mart made a huge mistake back in the early 80’s when they still were competitive with Wal-Mart. They backed off of a pure grocery section, and they went a cheap stuff-a-store plan.

Grocery was burdened by a union, so I forgive them that, but they should have re-entered after ditching the union.

Wal-Mart became a destination store and K-Mart became an afterthought.

At this point, the best thing they could do would be to rebrand all their boxes as Sears Retail, bring back food, and turn the K-Mart name into a competitor in small towns to Family Dollar.


29 posted on 09/12/2013 1:34:47 PM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson