Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: InterceptPoint
I'd still prefer a Roku 3, even if it lacks the ability to play back YouTube videos. Here's the reason why: a Roku 3 can access hundreds of channels of online video, something the Chromecast can't do. And with a very fast Internet connection, you get just about HD quality video, too.
15 posted on 09/14/2013 6:58:42 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RayChuang88
I'm not familiar with the Roku 3. The big advantage of the Chromecast is that you can search for content on an iPad or similar device. You have a mouse and a keyboard in your lap. That really is the difference between Chromecast and other devices: It gets rid of a traditional remote as your interface to your TV and replaces it with a fully functional computer.

Can Roku do that?

18 posted on 09/14/2013 7:04:04 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson