Stop “We’ve got to pass it to find out what’s in it.”
I remember the “ABC: Anyone But Church” committee to oust Frank Church (D, Idaho) from the senate. There were no calls to have them remove the name “Church” from their name.
So, it is OK to have a PAC supporting Nazi Pelosi incorporating her name, but not a PAC opposing to her?
Yeah, right! This stinks to high heavens.
Rename it “Ditch the Witch.”
(a) The name of each authorized committee shall include the name of the candidate who authorized such committee. Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no unauthorized committee shall include the name of any candidate in its name. For purposes of this paragraph, name includes any name under which a committee conducts activities, such as solicitations or other communications, including a special project name or other designation.
(b)(1) A delegate committee, as defined at 11 CFR 100.5(e)(5), shall include the word delegate(s) in its name and may also include in its name the name of the presidential candidate which the delegate committee supports. (
2) A political committee established solely to draft an individual or to encourage him or her to become a candidate may include the name of such individual in the name of the committee provided the committee's name clearly indicates that it is a draft committee.
(3) An unauthorized political committee may include the name of a candidate in the title of a special project name or other communication if the title clearly and unambiguously shows opposition to the named candidate.
Stop the BOTOXED IDIOT PAC.
Does Pelosi also own the name sanfran nan?
Otherwise, call it ‘Stop the (Western) Witch’ or something. Everybody will still get the name referring to Pelosi.
Rename it “StopPelousyGalorePAC”
stop isoleP ycnaN
Rename it the “Remove SanFranNan PAC”, or simply “Palomino”.
That could apply to 3/4 of the Congress...