Other threads have said that this was actually George HW Bush policy.
No tiger so toothless as a disarmed military.
Why don’t they call these zones ‘defense free’, or something like that? It’s true, once it’s called ‘gun-free’, the bad guys are welcome to come in with guns, so it’s not a gun-free zone at all.
Bill Clinton has helped to murder 23 service men.
... jaw drops... I didn’t know. I just assumed that it was out of some vague PC drift of the command mentality. I didn’t know it was a specific order. It sounds like it was an Executive Order from Clinton as CIC.
Send out the MSM clowns to question H!.
How many attacks by Muslims have we had? 10 billion? Yet liberals and RINOs still won't profile. Same with this situation: There can be a billion Fort hoods and they will still refuse the military the 2nd amendment.
Last night while flipping through channels there was some host on MSNBC (I know, but it was like looking at a car wreck - I couldn’t look away) saying gun free zones are the way to prevent all these shootings. His logic? He showed a sign from a gun show that said you can’t enter if you have a loaded weapon.
So he said that shows even conservatives know gun free zones are safer.
So I guess gun shows are full of helpless people, like schools, or people w/o access to protection (like the thousands of guns, and presumably guards) at gun shows.
Or maybe he’s hoping by pointing this out someone will decide a gun show w/b a good place for a nut case to attack people.
IBD EDITORIAL PING
IBD EDITORIAL PING
IBD EDITORIAL PING
Warning signs should be placed on ‘gun free zones’ so those of us who enjoy living can stay out of them...