Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kristinn
Six paragraphs in and al-Reuters refers to the terrorists as "militant gunmen."

Quakers? Anabaptists? Buddhists? Any ideas?

14 posted on 09/21/2013 11:42:53 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

At the time the Reuters article was posted, it wasn’t 100% certain who the attackers were. Al Shabaab has since claimed responsibility.


16 posted on 09/21/2013 11:48:59 AM PDT by kristinn (Welcome to the Soviet States of Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

Anglicans my sources tell me....


24 posted on 09/21/2013 12:06:48 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey ( Un-Documented Journalist / Block Captain..Tyranny Response Team)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

“Quakers? Anabaptists? Buddhists? Any ideas?”

Maybe they were Anamists? That would be possible in Africa...


34 posted on 09/21/2013 12:31:38 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson