Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DesertRhino
You make a good point here, but I disagree with you in this particular type of case.

When these announcements are made, the troops are described as "NATO troops" because the announcement comes from NATO command, not the Pentagon. It may seem like a subtle point, but that's exactly why everything is presented this way when these announcements come out of Afghanistan.

To reinforce this point, I don't think troops in Iraq were ever described as "NATO troops" whenever reports like this came out.

12 posted on 09/21/2013 4:29:45 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I've never seen such a conclave of minstrels in my life.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Aren’t they all officially “NATO troops” in Afghanistan now? If this was an area where there were mostly Americans, probably these were American troops.

Frankly, I think Barry is using NATO troops as a dodge to cover up the fact that the vast majority of those Americans killed in Afghanistan were killed during his (much shorter) watch because of the ROE and because of his Taliban-friendly attitude.


13 posted on 09/21/2013 4:40:35 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson