Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chiller

A majority of Americans elected and then re-elected Obama.

Your move.


94 posted on 09/22/2013 5:26:46 PM PDT by SargeK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: SargeK

True but things change, don’t they ? Changing every day, getting worse every day for Obie. I’ve been waiting for 5 years, but it’s moving our way.


97 posted on 09/22/2013 6:09:05 PM PDT by chiller (NBCNews et al is in the tank and should be embarrassed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

To: SargeK; chiller

I see your 0bama re/election and raise you a Benghazi (x2), Ft Hood, and a Boston Marathon.


98 posted on 09/22/2013 6:44:35 PM PDT by Repeat Offender (What good are conservative principles if we don't stand by them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

To: SargeK
"A majority of Americans elected and then re-elected Obama."

Sarge, the truth isn't obvious. Never forget Stalin's wise observation that “it only matters who counts the votes!”. Most federal elections in the US are managed by SEIU employees and Soros has, for at least six years, spent millions on a group of activists called “The Secretary of State Project”, reflecting their astute observation that Secretaries of State manage the voting processes in each state. It is a complicated issue that few understand, made more opaque by the secrecy surrounding our voting mechanisms. Think about it: If your political enemy is allowed to count votes out without any oversight by the opposition, and the counters depend for salaries that feed their families upon a predetermined outcome, would you expect them to report accurate counts for their opponent?

Not long about someone honestly conservative was quizzing a founder of an Egyptian opposition party about the elections that appeared to clearly make Morsi prime minister. She had to explain that in a one party state, where political opponents are regularly pulled of the street to prison and death, and Facebook is literally managed by the Egyptian police, what meaning would you presume elections to have? “Egyptian ‘elections’ are for the Western press.”

U.S. Elections, have no mechanism providing an audit trail for votes; government has eliminated the former safeguards such as paper ballots, and counting ballots in precincts with observers from all parties present, before the ballots are secured and stored. Federal offices cannot be attributed to, or traced to ballot counts. When dozens of precincts report more votes than eligible voters and nothing is done; when voters cannot be asked for proof of citizenship or even identification, our elections are a sham. When ballots disappear into computer memory, ballots into a box never to be seen again, and, in the few challenged cases, the counts change every time they are reported, as with Allen West's effort to get a fair count, we can only repeat what those who count the votes report to the media they control.

As Egyptian Christian, now temporarily in the U. S. after her party partner was killed, not granted a visa in almost two years when Bosnian Muslims have papers in weeks, Cynthia Farahat explained, and recent history has confirmed, The Muslim Brotherhood is hated in Egypt. That is why Egyptians of all classes denounce Obama as a terrorist. She explained that the Muslim Brotherhood has between six hundred and eight hundred thousand members. While Western media claim there are about eleven million Coptic Christians (Coptic means Egyptian), the real number is more like seventeen million, about twenty percent of the Egyptian population. In many if not most Egyptian towns the Wahhabi head coverings for women are not welcome - no hijabs, niqabs or burkas. Egyptians hate the Muslim Brotherhood and see Obama as one of them.

Obama has a title but lots of reasons to question its legitimacy, not least of which is that the secure database with personal information on every U.S. legislator is managed by a firm whose former CEO was a Wahhabi Muslim, John Brennan. Anyone needing to find weaknesses in a legislator doesn't need the NSA, or, as was used to silence Georgia Congressman Nathan Deal when he asked for confirmation of eligibility, the IRS. It was Brennan's employee who gave his life to protect exposure of Obama’s passport and foreign travel records. Is it any surprise that no other congressperson dared raise the eligibility issue?

Why did this happen? Could it be about money? What else to the Saudi's have with which to buy protection? What guides our legislature more certainly than their oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution? While many legislators may not be for sale, the database 'protected' by Brennan's firm provides more than enough with which to threaten anyone Congressman with a family. And never forget, Brennan is now director of the CIA. He is a Sunni Muslim, and is showing his allegiance to his Sunni brothers who feel threatened by Shia Iran, and Iran's proxies, Syria and

104 posted on 09/22/2013 10:46:00 PM PDT by Spaulding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson