Posted on 09/23/2013 2:30:44 AM PDT by lowbridge
Black mob violence and black on white crime has not destroyed the entire American Tobacco Trail. Only the small chunk that goes through Durham, North Carolina.
The high crime part. The gang-infested part. The poor part. The urban part. The part that local media calls every name imaginable except one: The black part.
Otherwise, most of the 22.5 miles of this trail is a safe, sometimes bucolic experience for runners, bikers, strollers even equestrians. As long as they stay away from the trail near Martin Luther King Jr. Parkway.
Since 2011, dozens of people have been beaten, robbed, pushed off bikes and threatened in that part of the trail. All of the suspects in this violence and mayhem are black.
Though most of the time the local media is loathe to say so. Either refusing to give a description, or doing what WRAL did in the latest attack: The TV station described one of the attackers as having a “dark complexion.”
-snip
Last August, a group of black people beat a jogger at 7:30 p.m. On the trail.
They did not rob him.
“The simple assaults don’t appear to be motivated by robbery,” the Durham Chief of Police told WRAL TV. “It appears to be motivated more by mischievousness and the locations where they find individuals who are clearly running by themselves.”
(Excerpt) Read more at whitegirlbleedalot.com ...
You got it. It’s a matter of when, not if and when may be sooner than anyone wants to believe.
If it says MLK Blvd on my gps...I drive around it.
I commented before on this so here goes again. Travel with a vicious dog, high capacity firearm, bear, not tear gas, travel in groups, carry walkie talkie connected to someone who will GET LEOs to your location. Petition city to install cameras to monitor trail.
Even if the police wanted to stop it, the savaging they would get from all the medias {print, t.v., radio] if they mussed a hair on one of the aspiring brain surgeons head would be horrible. The Self hating White Liberals let the genie out of the bag, let them put the genie back in.
I carry my 1911 most of the time. I now carry with a round in the chamber and the hammer forward. In the past I would carry without a round in the chamber.
So I went looking.. haven't found the official numbers yet but I did find this tidbit 'splainin' why there ain't a problem of black on white crime..
well at least the guy does more than stand there screaming "RACIST!"
You see the difference can be easily explained (if you're intelligent like the guy who typed in all this stuff) by "encounter rates."
Essentially it is the simple fact that blacks are far more likely to encounter a white than whites are likely to encounter a black.
So yes the stats show greater black-on-white crime than white-on-black crime but far less than it would be if crime was race based. He explains his math and then says:
"In other words, given general offending rates which are indeed higher for blacks than whites (but which still indicate that the overwhelming majority of blacks are not violent criminal offenders), and given the likelihood of interracial encounters between whites and blacks (and which are especially rare for whites encountering blacks), the rates of black-on-white interracial crime are either pretty much exactly what would be expected without any racial targeting whatsoever, or they are even lower than random chance would predict."
(BTW nowhere in ordinary discourse about the subject has it been argued that the overwhelming majority of blacks are violent criminal offenders.)
google a string of characters from the quote to find the site; e.g., "offending rates which are indeed higher for blacks than whites". I had the link ready than I noticed that it was not from a Monty Python Flying Circus skit. But you can find it with the search.
/sarcasm 'Boys Will Be Boys' just doesn't cover theft and random assault.
Buddy of mine in college had this very thing happen to him. Got jumped by four or five (he wasn't sure) black members of the football team on his way home from the library. Buddy got a couple of good shots in but received a pretty good beating for his efforts.
The college, and especially the newspaper, made my friend out as the bad guy. He said, "Really? Really? I'm going to attack a bunch of in-shape, athletic guys 2x my size? Really????".
Yep. That was the story. College was going to kick him out, until my friend lawyered up. That particular bit was easily resolved, but no action was taken against the "Mischevious Dark-Complexioned Youths". And the paper never retracted any of the terrible things they printed about him, either.
And this happened 20+ years ago. As much as we've been reading about it here on FR, this sort of behavior is nothing new under the sun.
I think that the only thing more reprehensible than the feral youth who do things like this are the white guilt liberals who try to excuse it away. Acceptance of bad behavior just foments more of the same, until something happens to stop it. And a reckoning is coming in that regard, I think.
I wondered something along those lines, myself. If you were to cut out (pick a number) 10? 20? areas in the country, what would crime look like in the the rest of the country? I'm thinking East St. Louis, Compton, All of Detroit and DC, and so on.
How much is the nationwide result skewed by a few dozen square miles of urban blight?
City: Durham Police Chief Jose Lopez cleared of nepotism allegations
New turmoil within Durham Police Department
Assistant police chief files EEOC complaint
Wilmington NC did it best. Named a portion of freeway with NO residential areas as MLK Blvd. no peeps, no problem...
I have driven MLK Blvd. in Wilmington on a Sunday morning from the Hotel (the cheap one) on the river to the airport. I was surprised how much it matched your description — no houses, no nothing.
Peet (a damn yankee who visited W. NC once)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.