Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Adder

“Kerry’s signature isn’t worth a bucket of warm spit”

It carries weight in that is signifies to the UN that the US President will now carry this to the US Senate for ratification. They have the votes in the Senate.

The workaround the Constitution is that it doesn’t outright ban weapons but it does setup a registry of all weapon owners and we all know the US Supreme Court will uphold such a registry as something that doesn’t prohibit bearing arms. We also know the US Supreme Court has ruled ANYTHING goes as long as it is in a form of a tax. Therefore, the treaty will be implemented as a tax; buy a gun, pay a tax, etc. Own a gun, pay a tax. In fact, just last year there was an IRS 1040 change being tossed around about paying taxes on firearms.


60 posted on 09/25/2013 11:14:31 AM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: CodeToad

I believe they need 2/3 vote of the Senate to ratify treaties.

“He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur;...” Art2 Sec2

So even trying to implement that I do not think will pass the Senate and definitely NOT the house.

I do not believe, or at least I hope, this will not be attempted by some executive order...even those have to have some sort of enabling legislation. Otherwise he could just do what he wanted, the heck with the constitution,

Hey....wait a minute....


73 posted on 09/25/2013 1:51:05 PM PDT by Adder (No, Mr. Franklin, we could NOT keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson