Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cunning_fish

When you invade a puny country without a real army, any doctrine would probably work. That one makes a lot of sense, with an emphasis on protecting the mechanized infantry. Light infantry is for clean up. I get that.

Can that be scaled up for combat with a real competitor country? How would it work as defense if an army crossed their border from, say China?


10 posted on 09/25/2013 9:41:47 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: GeronL

>>>When you invade a puny country without a real army, any doctrine would probably work. That one makes a lot of sense, with an emphasis on protecting the mechanized infantry. Light infantry is for clean up. I get that.<<<

Well, Georgia has invested enormous resources into it’s military since 2004 and it was by all objective accounts more numerous and better equipped than invading Russian force.

Russians has sent under 10 thousand troops to Ossetia and airdropped some 4000 VDV personnel to Azkhazia. It is a much lesser force than the entire Georgian military at the time.
As for main disadvantage for the Georgian troops is that their air force seized operations as soon as Russian planes appeared.


12 posted on 09/25/2013 10:00:53 PM PDT by cunning_fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson