Skip to comments.Adults Holding Traditional Values Cannot Adopt in Massachussetts
Posted on 09/26/2013 9:36:04 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
It's now official policy in Massachusetts: Adults holding traditional values will no longer be allowed to adopt or be foster parents.
On May 15, 2013, the Boston Bar Association held a forum with the Mass. Department of Children and Families (DCF) and the Mass. Commission on LGBT Youth. The DCF speakers confirmed that they are "weeding out" adoptive and foster parents who are not willing to wholly accept and support LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender) self-identification by a child in their care.
The general topic of the evening was the growing number of LGBT youth needing foster care. The hour-long event can be seen on YouTube. (Video credit: CatchoftheDay Video News.)
The shocking admission of the DCF's discriminatory policies towards parents holding traditional values comes in the last few minutes of the video.
Summary of major points at the forum
Erika Rickard, Vice Chair of the Mass. Commission on LGBT Youth and herself a foster parent, called attention to the urgent need for "supportive" foster parents for LGBT youth (who, she estimates, make up about 20% of youth in foster care in the state). The Commission is working in conjunction with the Mass. Department of Children and Families (DCF) to find them "safe, welcoming, and affirming homes."
Pointing to their high levels of rejection by their families, DCF wants to be sure these youth are placed with adults who completely accept the child's self-identification as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer. They have found that many adults who say they're OK with sexual orientation and gender identity issues before the child is in their home then change and don't give "proper support."
Every social worker in the Massachusetts DCF system now has LGBT issues training (first reported by my MassResistance blog in 2005). The DCF also now runs a mentoring program for foster and adoptive parents. The 8-hour course includes discussion of sexual orientation, gender identity, and trauma understanding. One DCF staffer, Jody, hopes to have the True Colors Out Youth Theater group (part of the Theater Offensive) perform at every regional office as part of staff training. She recommends that the group PFLAG (Parents Families Friends & Allies of LGBT People) speak to all foster parents on how they can show their acceptance and support.
Jody recruits foster parents. She emphasized that the foster parent has to be able to support whatever develops with the child, for example, if he comes out as gay, or learning disabilities become obvious.
The question was asked, "Can transgender people be foster parents?" The answer: "We [at DCF] are not considering your sexual orientation or gender identity. It's about your fitness." You can't have a criminal background; you must be able and willing and have the means to support a child. "Gender identity is not at all a factor." Rickard (co-chair of the Commission on LGBT Youth) repeated that foster parents need to be ready to accept whatever may come with the adolescent. The DCF staffer said that the non-discrimination policies within the DCF apply to foster families as well as staff.
The youth panelist said there's a need for foster parents who don't question the rightness of being gay. Just "passive acceptance" is not enough. One attendee asked if there is a difference between abusive homes, non-supportive parents, or parents who just ignore the LGBT issues presented by the child. The DCF staffers Michelle and Jody explained (in the last few minutes of the video):
Foster parents who may hold more traditional values and who "age out" of the system makes this change to supportive homes easier. "It gives us an opportunity to train folks in a different way of thinking and being more accepting." (Ten hours a year of LGBT-sensitive training is required of foster parents.) The DCF is "setting new expectations; we are weeding out some of the ... destructive behaviors that are occurring" in the foster homes. Sometimes these are very "subtle" but "a case has to be built." Further, "now that the climate is changing," DCF wants the youth to understand that the DCF will not accept this kind of behavior from a provider or caretaker. LGBT-ally liaisons in each foster care office can fill in gaps if some social workers are not doing their job adequately to ensure this policy. This "re-education" of staff and foster parents is ongoing.
History of radicalization of DCF/DSS adoption & foster care policy
We have documented in past years how the DCF (formerly the Department of Social Services, DSS) was moving in this radical direction. In 1994, the Office of Child Care Services (overseeing adoption) issued a regulation (though not law) that a placement agency must "not discriminate in providing services to children and their families on basis of ... sexual orientation." Lesbians and homosexual men have been allowed to adopt ever since. As long ago as 2000, the DSS urged parents to accept homosexuality or bisexuality in their children, asking: "If the adolescent has identified a sexual orientation of gay, lesbian, or bi-sexual, has he/she disclosed this information to a parental figure or trusting adult? If so, has the adolescent received an appropriate, receptive and supportive response?"
The MassResistance blog reported on "LGBT youth issues" training given to about 1,800 Mass. DSS employees in 2004, including those working in adoption and foster care. The radical National Gay & Lesbian Task Force led the training sessions (funded in part by the leftist Tides Foundation). Also at this time, the DSS set up a group home specifically for "out-of-home youth" identifying as "transgender" in Waltham, MA.
In 2006, the Home for Little Wanderers, which works closely with the DCF (then the DSS), told the Boston Globe, "We have successfully placed children with gay and lesbian families for over a decade." By 2007, a Boston homosexual newspaper reported:
GLBT families stand as good a chance of being parents to any of the 600 children in the state waiting to be adopted from foster care as traditional families. ... a social worker with the Home for Little Wanderers, says about 40 percent of her foster care cases in the public sector ending with adoption are into GLBT families. Her organization has done specific outreach to the GLBT community to recruit new homes for children in the Massachusetts public system. ..."We want to make sure that all families have the same opportunities."
MASSACHUSETTS POLICY: No more placements with parents holding traditional values
So now the radical evolution of the Mass. Department of Children and Families adoption and foster care department (and adoption agencies it works with) is complete. LGBT adults singles or couples have a hugely disproportionate chance of receiving an adoptive or foster care placement.
Even more discriminatory (as the May 2013 video confirms), you need not bother applying to be an adoptive or foster parent in Massachusetts if you hold traditional values and would wish to dissuade your child from "identifying" and behaving as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender. Such attitudes are now considered "destructive behaviors" by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. You won't even get past the screening process. Only those "straight" adults who are LGBT "allies" will make it.
The Romney Legacy.
Of course it makes total sense to reduce the pool of available adoptive and foster parents.
More evidence of the “end times” we live in.
Next step: Take away biological children of parents with Christian values.
Take the easy and popular way out.
Liberals have made a profession out of it.
Insanity is the screwball state.
There. Fixed it.
I wonder if they will place straight kids with LGBTQGFYCXX parents - do they apply the same tests?
So let me get this straight (pun intended), a traditional family cannot adopt an LGBT kid because traditional families cannot relate. But, the argument made in order to allow gays to adopt in the first place was that a “normal” kid raised by LGBT parents would not necessarily end up LGBT.
They did this with black children years ago, refusing to allow adoption by white parents. The claim was that the white parents would not honor the child’s “black culture.”
I’m sure that, given the choice, most children would prefer to be raised in a home with food, clean clothes and nurturing parents, rather than in a drug-infested tenement surrounded by gang bangers.
Try and tell me we are not living in the same USA as described in the FICTIONAL book “The Turner Diaries” (one of the things which pushed Tim McVeigh over the edge)!
Putin so got this right....Stay away from our kids and grandkids.
There aren’t enough gays much less enough who want to adopt.
I see this as a plus to the prison business, AA and those who support a reduction in the human population.
HEY! HEY! You need to sit down and shut up with that logic shit!
When it comes to LGBT issues, logic is neither valid nor wanted - it’s all about emotions and that old time, rock solid “love” argument!
Applying logic - phft! /s
And they get audited by the IRS every time they try to adopt.
LOL....okay, i will go back to sitting in the corner.
foster kids are from dysfunctional homes and the state is placing them into further abnormal circumstances.....great...just great...
Challenge it in court or adopt outside the country. Seems discriminatory to me.
Farming out confused kids to these perverts to be used as sex toys.
Read Matt. 18:6 and Luke 17:2 to see what the Lord has to say about this abomination.
There are many things that anger the Lord but those who hurt or corrupt children are objects of His unrelenting wrath and will burn for eternity if they do not repent.
THE judges are cattreing to hit men to do their protection. Nazi pogrooms is what it is.
You go to court now and a conservative is going to be vilified.
this is why gay marriage is evil, it never was about fags mrrying each other, it was about themselves marrying children.
Michelle and her demented husband are proud of their “americans”, and I for one am utterly disgusted. I am not setting a toe in that freak state. THese so called country men’s retardedness disgusted me, now I am uttelry disgusted by them.
Is anyone familiar with The Inter-American Institute?
Before I get upset, I want to make sure this is not an exaggeration.
It’s no exaggeration.
Lots of info on the queer/straight battle in MA here. Check out the "Fistgate" and "Black Book" articles. Not recent but representative.
So “welcoming and affirming” your foster child in engaging in anal sex is “safe” ?
Why did no one stand up and yell “Bullshit !” ?
The logic is that marriage is about a bit also a story of children married into their family.Hence the logic is that of pedophile gansgters who only marry each other so that they can marry in innocent children in their perverted clutches.
It was Obama who was prototyped that way. Memory from my father is satanhood, it is a coded dream of Obama of havng been raised by a gay father ie. married into a rich gay man as a child.
THis is some sick crap.
What are the current Las Vegas odds for which city will get the “Sodom & Gomorrah #3” prize and “reward”? (Olongopo won #2 and got the Mt Pinatubo surprise)
Boston, closing fast?
Because it was originally the "Republican" Governor pushing it, so the folks who should have been screaming the loudest were instead standing mute.
Now it's reached the point in Massachusetts that the ones who do dare speak out are crushed under the jackboot into the dust.
Perhaps DC. Two days ago the U.S. Senate voted 98-0 to confirm the first ever openly sodomite federal circuit court judge to the bench.
Funny, years ago on FR I compared homosexuality to racial racist preferences as a basis of the liberal language, making them completely part of the incestuous inbreeding program of the nazies, despite so called banning homosexuality by the nazies. Because regardless what the laws were on the Nazi books, the leftist language dominated it and would ultimatey tend to its final communist synthesis.
Now we got pedophilia. Shame on the GOPe for pursuing this stuff with liberals.
The monster got his nose in the tent in the name of “tolerence.”
Now it’s all the way in the tent, shown itself, quite predictably, to be utterly intolerant, and has kicked out the host.
After this kind of terrorism in Massachoicette, I can see why the Tsarnaev brothers were surprized to be hunted by police after the Boston Ramadan orgy marathon bombing.
No wonder Michelle was seen catering to her islamic rapist buddies at this hopsital.
Makes perfect sense.
As a cop I would have refused to risk my carreer playing hero against hadjis in Boston only to be fired or demoted like that cop who published the pictures in reaction to the Rolling Stone’s homo Trayon style portrayal of the bomber.
Any decent LEO would walk out of this place and get hired elsewhere or t they might as well stand down from here on out. It thus makes sense the swat would stand down when that Navy Yard shooter popped out: “oh, wait, he is black and hadji gay, and we might get punished for killing him”.
Leave Mass then, come to a conservative state. When the SHTF we all need to be near each other anyways.
So, we’ve gone from accepting “gay marriage” to condemning normal marriage? That was sure a fast trip.
Yes, as a matter of fact it certainly does make sense, if one is trying to maximize the likelihood of placing children with pervs. I can't think of a better "recruiting tool."
This is what life is like on the other side of the looking glass.
Where is the picture of a millstone around the neck of those who support this?
U.S. exceptionalism is now exceptionally bad.
Supporting Islamic terrorists and waging a war against Christians in our country. We have become a Satanic society. Time to face facts.
We’re going to need a lot of millstones.
Maybe there really is something in the drinking water in that state.
Did Mass suck this hard 20 years ago? 30 or 40 years ago?
Oh, it’s worse than that. What they’re saying is that traditional values families can’t adopt AT ALL, because there’s a chance the child might identify as gay.
Then look at the supporting numbers (if I have them right). 20% of the kids in the system are gay? And 40% of the placements are with gay families?
I have a question that perhaps an adoptive family can answer.
Say I’m an unwed 15-year-old who is pregnant. Say I want to put my baby up for adoption but I flatly refuse to allow homosexuals to adopt my child.
What rights, if any, do I have in that case? I know that many birth parents actually CHOOSE the couple they want to adopt their child. Do these birth parents no longer have that choice?
Are you in Marxistchusetts?
Well, at that point all bets are off.