You’re very sensitive for someone that has no problem attributing depraved traits to others without evidence.
You don’t agree with my definition of libertarianism and how it’s distinguished from liberalism, right?
Is this going to be just another series of weird personal attacks from you?
Why not just respond to the post itself, and no, no one cares about your personal definitions for anything?
Why is opposing the libertarian position on homosexuality and law, for instance in the military and immigration statism?
ansel12 to Gene Eric
Calling people who do not support the libertarian position on homosexuals and the military for instance “statist” is no defense for radical liberalism.
Opposing this libertarian claptrap is not statist, it is conservatism and traditional Americanism.
libertarianism’s position on personal relationships and laws and government:
“”Sexual orientation, preference, gender, or gender identity should have no impact on the government’s treatment of individuals, such as in current marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration or military service laws.””