Eventually, it becomes pointless trying to explain that a true small l libertarian is NOT pro gay marriage and in fact is NOT pro homosexual agenda in any form - in fact the homosexual agenda activists are often way more scared of small l libertarians than anyone else. And that there are plenty of small l libertarians - and those of us here on FR are great examples - who are as passionate about getting rid of abortion forever as conservatives. And that a true small l libertarian is not gonna promote casual sex, homosexualism, porn and drugs in our public schools - because a true small l libertarian advocates for our public schools teaching reading, writing, math, science and history and that’s it.
But of course, it gets old trying to eplain this to people.
Agreed.
The Country began on small libertarianism, not the behemoth of statism it is today.
Because it isn't true, no one cares about whatever your personal differences with libertarianism are, it doesn't change libertarianism.
Look at this Cato article for instance and how libertarianism is defined. It is defined just as I always define, conservative economics and social liberalism. """We define libertarians as those who favor "smaller government" and think government should not promote "traditional values."""
ie ""Sexual orientation, preference, gender, or gender identity should have no impact on the government’s treatment of individuals, such as in current marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration or military service laws.""
Yep...
But yeah, when it comes to explaining it to the same person for the thirtieth or fortieth time, I give up.