[ansel12]

Too bad the article uses my definition.

See post 128.

[Gene Eric]

>> Too bad the article uses my definition.

While you may think it's "too bad", you're admitting we don't agree on the definitions. It was bound to happen one day despite the fact you were working so hard to avoid it:

You don’t agree with my definition of libertarianism and how it’s distinguished from liberalism, right?

So to answer an outstanding question of yours, I don't support the homosexualization of the Country whether in the Military, institution of Marriage, schools, etc.; a position 1) not inconsistent with the book definition of libertarianism, 2) consistent with the book definition of conservatism, but a position 3) at odds with the book definition of liberalism.

Bye!