[Rodamala]

All those "new normals" you are attributing as an agenda of libertarians or the Libertarian Party are misleading. I believe the point is that the federal government should have no part of what brand of shoe you wear, what sort of medical coverage one elects to have, or how often a man may have sex with his wife... or go out for ice cream. The place for evaluating stuff like homos in the military is in open society. Personally, I have had one good gay friend in my life, and he was an angry, petty, little wretch of a man... but still, he was a good friend. The point is that society should be responsible for deciding what it consider socially acceptable... or if homos ought to be taken seriously. Even if the queer agenda is so "loud and proud", I believe a majority of people in society see homosexual men simply as perversions of nature that have turdmeat on the tip of their peckers.

[ansel12]

I believe the point is that the federal government should have no part of what brand of shoe you wear, what sort of medical coverage one elects to have, or how often a man may have sex with his wife... or go out for ice cream.

Those are all conservative positions so that isn't it.

Now the second portion of your post where you timidly started to promote the homosexual agenda, that was getting into the area of discussion and the disagreement between conservative traditional America and libertarians.