Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SUSSA

LOL, nonsense, Reagan was no libertarian and distanced himself from them even in that 1975 interview when he was trying not to offend them.

You are seeing libertarians defend the homosexual agenda on this very thread, just as you see on every libber thread, you are doing that in that very post when you call to end marriage and just let everyone just make up there own definitions.

Actually they can already, anyone can and always could, it just wasn’t legal when it came time for divorce or death, child custody, inheritance etc, or in the military for instance, one of the countless places where the government has to decide which soldiers are legally “married”.


137 posted on 09/30/2013 5:25:36 PM PDT by ansel12 ( 'I'm on That New Obama Diet... Every Day I Let Vladimir Putin Eat My Lunch' .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

The objection I have to homos in the military is that they are thrown in with straights. If they had separate units for queer men and for queer women let them serve. However, don’t make straight guys and girls shower, etc. with them.

As to marriage if government didn’t give special privileges to married couples it wouldn’t be an issue. But we already have a problem with Mohammidans insisting on their religious laws be recognized in civil matters.


142 posted on 09/30/2013 5:39:43 PM PDT by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson