[2ndDivisionVet]

Comments?

[x]

Comments?

Why? It's just a rehash of 20 year old talking points that didn't have much truth in them to begin with.

If you are writing about politics for esquire.com, and turning out an average of one blog post an hour, how much thought are you really putting into your articles?

[usurper]

Comments?

Why yes, thanks for not posting the entire article, the short portion was quite enough to make me feel stupid for having wasted my time.

[driftless2]

Not much. This a just simple, and I do mean simple, rehash of every screwball lib anti-Reagan/conservatism screed for the last 30+ years. I've read many of them. Pierce is just one of numerous libs who think they know more than they actually do. Like virtually all lib scribblers, vituperation and ad hominem attacks constitute Pierce's uh "arguments." And read the comments of the stooges under the column. Brainwashed leftist acolytes. None of them offer a decent argument either.

Yes libs, we get it...you don't like Reagan or conservatism. You really can't explain why, so you resort to your usual methods of slander and stopping off at the pie store to stock up on more lib ammunition.