1 posted on
10/01/2013 11:11:36 AM PDT by
george76
To: george76
Guns will be baned from the public within a few years if the communist Democrats still control America.
To: george76
How could judge Blake ever see harm caused by a law she surely supports?
3 posted on
10/01/2013 11:50:53 AM PDT by
andyk
(I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
To: george76
Another example of a Federal judge saying, “ To heck with the people, the government signs my paycheck. I work for the government!”
4 posted on
10/01/2013 12:07:48 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(The time for impeachment has come.)
To: george76
Thank you for her name. I will remember it at election time.
To: george76; Abundy; Albion Wilde; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; bayliving; BFM; Bigg Red; ...
The judge is apparently a Clinton appointee.
Maryland “Freak State” PING!
8 posted on
10/01/2013 7:54:59 PM PDT by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Major brain damage at UMES, but no property damage!)
To: george76
“There’s a strong public interest in lessening the risk of tragedies,” Judge Blake said. “Potentially the only economic harm could be on behalf of the dealers.” How comforting it is to know that Judge Blake has decided only gun dealers will suffer economically from this.
I'd like the Judge to provide the evidence that this set of gun laws will "lessen the risk of tragedies." The evidence needs to be explicit.
9 posted on
10/02/2013 2:23:11 AM PDT by
sauropod
(Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson