The Dems passed an ugly law on party lines, in the dark, unread, using bribes and parliamentary parlor games. Barry signed it, then we all read is and became nauseated. The Supremes morphed a mandate to buy a product into a tax, then Barry re-wrote the law like a banana republic dictator. How about taking the entire case back to Roberts et al to demonstrate that this sequence of events and the law itself is unconstitutional, Why are we tolerating an imperial president to creating and modifying law out of whole cloth, singlehandedly? "Law of the land" is a phony argument.
Based on the antics above, why are we not seeking impeachment?
Where do we find "continuing resolution" in the Constitution? "Regular order" calls for a series of bills (not piecemeal but planned). Any "grand bargain" is clearly not in the spirit of the Constitution.
Barry, Harry, and SanFranNan are leading an illegal strike. Get back to work, slackers!
....because that's the least likely path to success....