Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Just How Old is Dinosaur Soft Tissue?
http://www.apologeticspress.org ^ | 11/1/2012 | Eric Lyons

Posted on 10/04/2013 7:15:37 AM PDT by kimtom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: tacticalogic

I’d love to tell you my hands are clean and I never make any mistakes but the Good Book tells me and observation shows “All have sinned and fallen short of God’s Glory” Romans 3:23 paraphrased from memory and several slightly different translations...

AFAIK I’ve not created any CREVO strawmen arguments though. And just b/c I participate in a debate does not mean I endorse any other author or poster 100%.


61 posted on 10/04/2013 10:46:44 AM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels
I’ve seen both

The question is not about what kind of errors you've seen, but how they have been initially described.

One more time: Have you ever seen errors described as (and at the time appear to be) "random", and then turn out not to actually be random when more information is available?

62 posted on 10/04/2013 10:49:52 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

If Brandt beats me to the punch, more power to him


63 posted on 10/04/2013 10:56:40 AM PDT by kimtom (USA ; Freedom is not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

Well I hope your not implying random errors don’t exist - they are commonly found in all areas of study.

But yes as I said before the vast number of computer software errors are caused by humans and not random.


64 posted on 10/04/2013 10:59:32 AM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels

>> To cook a fossil, it would have to be buried something like a kilometer deep
> Surely you don’t mean that?

Ground temperature increases with depth as you get closer to the mantle. Only a few kilometers deep the ambient temperature can boil water.


65 posted on 10/04/2013 11:02:19 AM PDT by Driabrin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: kimtom
If Brandt beats me to the punch, more power to him

Do you agree with his answer:

YES. We might as well be OK with it since it’s been par for the course [both sides] in these FR CREVO debates.

The FR CREVO debates have historically been contentious, polarizing, and a source of much animosity among the membership because they've descended into name calling an personal attacks. You think we need us some more of that?

66 posted on 10/04/2013 11:29:41 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels

And yet they find them deeper than 1 or several kilometers!


67 posted on 10/04/2013 11:41:32 AM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels

And yet they find them deeper than 1 or several kilometers!


68 posted on 10/04/2013 11:41:40 AM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Driabrin

You are speaking of denaturing, not quite the same thing. Protein degrades over time without exposure to oxygen or biologicals. Room temp at the atomic level is still a buzz saw of activity.


69 posted on 10/04/2013 11:51:03 AM PDT by dangerdoc (see post #6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: kimtom

You mean like Eric Lyons?


70 posted on 10/04/2013 12:43:04 PM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels

Citing creationscience.com is laughable and I’m not going to refute your cut and past line by line, but here’s some information regarding the misconceptions about your alleged bee nest fossils: http://www.academia.edu/1236905/Re-evaluation_of_alleged_bees_nests_from_the_Upper_Triassic_of_Arizona


71 posted on 10/04/2013 12:58:23 PM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

> Protein degrades over time without exposure to oxygen or
> biologicals. Room temp at the atomic level is still a
> buzz saw of activity.

No, it doesn’t. Proteins are for the most part chemically inactive. That property is what keeps you from disintegrating. Chemistry inside a biological cell is a highly controlled activity with only permitted reactions taking place, most of which require catalytic enzymes. Room temperature may be “a buzz saw of activity”, but biomolecules are so stable that no reactions can take place unassisted. As long as the cell membrane is intact and no reactive substances break in, the cell can lie dormant indefinitely.


72 posted on 10/04/2013 1:54:58 PM PDT by Driabrin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Driabrin

Half life of a protein bond is 400 years

http://bionumbers.hms.harvard.edu/mBionumber.aspx?&id=105352&ver=5


73 posted on 10/04/2013 6:39:15 PM PDT by dangerdoc (see post #6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: kimtom; stormer
How can the soft tissue survive 65 million years?

It wasn't soft tissue, it was hard, dried out, but not petrified.

The scientific term is dessicated.

They had to rehydrate the tissue (repeatedly) to actually produce soft tissue.

NOW, let's simplify.

No one seems to have a problem with this mosquito being completely preserved for 40 million years.


74 posted on 10/04/2013 11:36:34 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

“..wasn’t soft tissue, it was hard, dried out..”

oaky, it was un-fossilized soft tissue.


75 posted on 10/07/2013 3:30:35 AM PDT by kimtom (USA ; Freedom is not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels

If DNA is a perfect replicator like a conventional computer program, how come we don’t look alike?


76 posted on 10/15/2013 11:42:50 AM PDT by R7 Rocket (The Cathedral is Sovereign, you're not. Unfortunately, the Cathedral is crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: R7 Rocket

Your putting words in my mouth - never said DNA is a perfect replicator.

But one could compare favorably software defects with biological mutations. Please understand that God allows both mutations [errors] and natural selection for His own purposes. Natural selection [thanks to the research of Mendel] multiplies the different character traits to choose from several prior generations [excluding the 1st several early generations of course] of both male and female types when a new living organism is conceived.

Side note - 1st generation of DNA would most resemble our Creators’ original declaration of perfection in Genesis reviewing 1st week of work “It is good”.

While no one cares for these physical defects they may serve a purpose in both humility and recognition of sin. The wages of sin bringing death and destruction.

Of course, God can perfect the DNA code [the hope of Heaven], after all He created it from approx a half billion lines of code in the smallest to 3 billion for man and approaching 50 billion for the most complex life forms found on Earth [see Paris Japonis - recently replaced the Marbled Lungfish].

This at least I choose to believe over a long series of accidents and random changes resulting in the extreme bio-diversity we see in nature. For my soul this enlightenment shouts there has to be an Awesome Creator/Originator who authored all of this just like He declares in the Bible but ymmv.


77 posted on 10/16/2013 5:17:23 AM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: R7 Rocket

Your putting words in my mouth - never said DNA is a perfect replicator.

But one could compare favorably software defects with biological mutations. Please understand that God allows both mutations [errors] and natural selection for His own purposes. Natural selection [thanks to the research of Mendel] multiplies the different character traits to choose from several prior generations [excluding the 1st several early generations of course] of both male and female types when a new living organism is conceived.

Side note - 1st generation of DNA would most resemble our Creators’ original declaration of perfection in Genesis reviewing 1st week of work “It is good”.

While no one cares for these physical defects they may serve a purpose in both humility and recognition of sin. The wages of sin bringing death and destruction.

Of course, God can perfect the DNA code [the hope of Heaven], after all He created it from approx a half billion lines of code in the smallest to 3 billion for man and approaching 50 billion for the most complex life forms found on Earth [see Paris Japonis - recently replaced the Marbled Lungfish].

This at least I choose to believe over a long series of accidents and random changes resulting in the extreme bio-diversity we see in nature. For my soul this enlightenment shouts there has to be an Awesome Creator/Originator who authored all of this just like He declares in the Bible but ymmv.


78 posted on 10/16/2013 5:17:37 AM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: R7 Rocket

from my fr homepage [you might like the links too]...

The complexities encoded in DNA alone affirm a super-natural knowledge implanted in every living creature far superior to all of the computer code generated by mankind. Every living cell contains DNA, with only a few exceptions i.e. when red-blood cells shed their nucleus. DNA contains the estimated equivalence of 3 billion coded-letter sequences of A C T & G. If recorded in books, this code would form a stack equal to the height of the Washington Monument. It has been estimated that the number of messages communicated between the brain, spinal column, and nervous system numbers into the hundreds of trillions per second.

This awesome computer-like DNA code is:

1) distinctly crafted for reproducing each created kind,

2) self-correcting with a wide variety of healing processes,

3) a natural clock indicative of a young earth,

4) highly-integrated, multi-faceted, inter-leaved, & redundant logic to minimize and/or eliminate copy errors,

5) unique for each kind and unique again amongst each copied kind due to gene selection/regression, variation, mutation, and adaptation,

6) pre-programmed with internal intelligence for maturation, survivability, & adaptability regarding most every environmental variation [consider the navigating abilities for migratory birds],

7) AND on display with all lifeforms throughout all natural history [consider the complexities of all the inter and intra-dependent kinds and the many varied eco-systems supporting them] bearing witness to the awesome power of God!!! How could this not possibly bear witness to the logic-filled ~ Logos and the super-natural life-breathed ~ Rhema also described in the Bible? If/when the modern-day science ‘experts’ ever succeed in crafting their own 3 billion lines of code, how will they ever duplicate God’s breath of life?

BTW don’t know how you got your handle but my 1st sports car was nicknamed the ‘pocket rocket’ for it’s ferocious horsepower to weight ratio - the Mazda RX7.


79 posted on 10/16/2013 5:20:46 AM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels
The complexities encoded in DNA alone affirm a super-natural knowledge implanted in every living creature far superior to all of the computer code generated by mankind. Every living cell contains DNA, with only a few exceptions i.e. when red-blood cells shed their nucleus. DNA contains the estimated equivalence of 3 billion coded-letter sequences of A C T & G. If recorded in books, this code would form a stack equal to the height of the Washington Monument. It has been estimated that the number of messages communicated between the brain, spinal column, and nervous system numbers into the hundreds of trillions per second.

Does that mean God personally creates each snowflake supernaturally?

80 posted on 10/16/2013 3:07:38 PM PDT by R7 Rocket (The Cathedral is Sovereign, you're not. Unfortunately, the Cathedral is crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson