To: kimtom
I believe the article is about the question , not the find. I think the author assumed knowledge of the fact.The author is attacking scientists for their reaction to a discovery that has never been made. How is that helping?
46 posted on
10/04/2013 10:00:30 AM PDT by
tacticalogic
("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
How old is the sample in discussion?
How do you arrive at that?
Does the evidence support it?
50 posted on
10/04/2013 10:08:04 AM PDT by
kimtom
(USA ; Freedom is not Free)
To: tacticalogic
I do not think to author is “attacking”, but I will look into it.
Maybe define attack??
questioning a hypothesis is not attacking
51 posted on
10/04/2013 10:10:29 AM PDT by
kimtom
(USA ; Freedom is not Free)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson