Not when there is an overwhelming amount of facts, scientific reasoning and logic indicating otherwise.
My profession is software engineer and I can tell you random changes do not improve the code. And making continued random changes will eventually render the code useless [for physical life forms ~ extinction].
Have you ever seen a software glitch be described as (and at the time appear to be "random") and then find out it wasn't really "random" after you ran some diagnostic traces and got more information?
If DNA is a perfect replicator like a conventional computer program, how come we don’t look alike?