Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
This paragraph in the article seems to run counter to your assertion:

“Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid supports the measure, but said Saturday that if furloughed workers are guaranteed back pay, there’s no reason to keep them out of work.”

Unsurprisingly, Reid is conflating terms. All Federal workers are in furlough status and thus not being paid. Some furloughed Federal workers (essential workers) are still required to report to work despite their furlough status.

I agree 100% that if employees have not been required to work, they should not be paid. However, if the workers were required to show up to work, they should be paid. That seems like just plain common sense.

51 posted on 10/05/2013 6:26:36 PM PDT by Terabitten (I'd rather have one Walker than fourteen runners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Terabitten

That’s exactly what I said. If they work, they should be paid.

But again, while you may or may not be technically correct about the use of the word “furlough,” I bet you couldn’t find 1% of the people who are using the word that way. When they say “furloughed,” they are referring to those “non-essential” personnel who are not at work.


55 posted on 10/05/2013 6:40:04 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson