Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reformedliberal

Park management should have made it clear that if one of the members wanders away from base and the park closes on them Yellowstone is not liable.


135 posted on 10/08/2013 8:06:34 AM PDT by erlayman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: erlayman

Are you trying to imply that armed restraint and deprivation of freedom of movement were simply aimed at reducing liability for the Federal Government? It was an act aimed at protecting American taxpayers?

Funny that they had funds for armed restraint personnel and no funds for continuing their contractual services.

It is totally bogus, overreaching and, if allowed to continue, the death of freedom in this nation.


137 posted on 10/08/2013 8:14:46 AM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson