He should have simply said “Yes, don’t you?” and then moved on to the next question
I personally haven’t forgotten that bill contained all kinds of unrelated crap that progressives have wanted for decades. Things like green building codes and energy mandates.
We haven’t begun to see how bad this really is.
What?! Is Blitzer still alive? My gawd, I thought he died years ago.
"Extreme". LOL. Little Wolfie can't seem to understand the concept of Repubs speaking up for their base. (come to think of it, most of us can't... but that's another topic...)
“The Supreme Court approved it saying it was constitutional. The president was reelected by 5 million votes so it is the law of the land right now.”
“It’s the flaw of the land in actuality,” Broun shot back.
Brilliant.
The “Jeopardy Genius” knows everything.
So is the Defense Of Marriage Act, yet I don’t see you getting all worked up over the President derailing that law of the land that was signed into law. Move on to another topic Wolf, your hypocrisy is showing.
Well, I'll be....Blitzer is reciting, word-for-word, the exact same set of talking points that are being splashed on various Republican social media sites.
Now what a coincidence!
Isn't passing a national budget yearly also the Law of the Land Isn't the federal government defending states from foreign invasion also the Law of the Land?
Methinks the little mouthpiece 0bamakissin' Liberal twerp Wolfie just likes certain laws and doesn't mind if the really important ones spelled out in the Constitution are ignored.
He could have asked Blitzed if Blitzed thinks the government cannot run without Obamacare.
“Do you still stand by all of those pretty extreme words?” the CNN host asked.
I am so tired of this one way propaganda. Who sponsors this idiot? Am I buying things from a company that sponsors this fool? Conservatives need to put together a coalition that takes the most egregious propaganda activities of these enemies of the American people, and pressure their sponsors to drop support. Money is ther only thing these media sleazies understand.
Why does this Congressman have to answer Blitzer’s badgering?
I’d just tell the CNN host to go back to rump kissing President Stompyfeet (I love that).
Someone posted on the actual healthcare site that their policy had been cancelled because it did not meet the new requirements. And they had been trying to get a new policy through the web site and they could not because of the faulty programming. They now have no insurance because of this obomination.
Can you imagine Blitzer if he had been born in the 1800’s and there was TV in 1863.
He'd be there defending slavery because it is “the law of the land”
Or if he was just a two or three decades old defending the Jim Crow laws on a 1963 program because it's “the law of the land”
Martin Luther King knew that some laws were wrong, would Blitzer have been grilling him and letting him know how great all laws are and they should remain the same forever?
I'm set for life! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!”
~What Blitzer REALLY means
So? The People ALSO elected a House full of Republicans to obstruct it. This also doesn't mean that it can never be repealed, either. Quite the contrary, it's exactly what the House was elected to do. Stuff it, Blitz.
So is the Second Amendment. Do you support that on the same grounds, Wolf?
It’s what FOLLOWS Obozocare that worries many of us.
The fight over Obamacare is about stopping the unvetted, unqualified, narcissistic megalomaniacal former community organizer and tyrant in the White House from bringing about his “transformation of America”. That phrase was and is code among his dumbed down and/or uninformed supporters for creating a despotic Marxist redistributionist Utopia. That it has failed everywhere it has been attempted and left misery and death in its wake is of no concern to them. The magic Obama can make it finally work.
One element that may puzzle some of you is why more of the wealthy captains of industry and capitalists – who ostensibly have the most to lose – haven’t spoken out in opposition.
Two reasons (there may be more):
1. They believe they will be princes in the new order, their lives of wealth and ease little affected by the distress inflicted on the us down here, the mass of the great unwashed. They really should restudy the histories of those who collaborated with other tyrants who, once in firm control, dispatched those who had the resources and intellect to topple the new “king” once the inclination to do so took hold of them.
2. During the Cold War, the head of Citibank, one Walter Wriston, was asked why his New York based organization continued to provide financing to the tyrants running the Soviet Union and the slave states the USSR dominated. He replied that it made little difference to him what sort of government these nations had and his only concern was “Can they pay their bills?”
The WWII era Norwegians applied a real world name of real world fellow Norwegian for those folks: Quisling.
Obviously, Blitzer hasn’t gone to the website & found out how much Obamacare will cost him & his family.
The problem these libs have is they know they’re losing this battle. They think more face time will help. I hope the GOP continues to hold the line. The democrats are domestic terrorists and we need to treat them as such.
A Fox News national poll asks voters to imagine being a lawmaker and having to cast an up-or-down vote on raising the debt ceiling: 37 percent would vote in favor of it, while 58 percent would vote against it.
Most Republicans (78 percent) and a majority of independents (57 percent) would vote against raising the limit. So would almost all Tea Partiers (88 percent).
Even Democrats, by a 48-42 percent margin, are more likely to say spending cuts must accompany an increase in the debt limit.
By wide margins Republicans (77-11 percent) and independents (65-26 percent) would require cuts in government spending before agreeing to raise the debt ceiling.