Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog

Yep, you nailed on several important points. First, solids are going to be produced and disposed of as with current technology. Wouldn’t surprise me if if this used an old fashioned stabilization pond type bioreactor, which takes a lot of area and very likely to require tertiary treatment that would tilt the economics the wrong direction.


23 posted on 10/13/2013 6:26:03 AM PDT by Hootowl99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Hootowl99
"First, solids are going to be produced and disposed of as with current technology."

At this point, there is no data to decide one way or the other. If it turns out NOT to generate solids, IMO, this would be a major plus.

"Wouldn’t surprise me if if this used an old fashioned stabilization pond type bioreactor, which takes a lot of area and very likely to require tertiary treatment that would tilt the economics the wrong direction."

For this test reactor, they used two beakers. A wee bit early to talk about ponds and such.

28 posted on 10/13/2013 3:42:56 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson