Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Hmm. Female chauvinist, and under the impression that she can bully Sarah Palin.
1 posted on 10/14/2013 2:25:44 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Olog-hai

If Debbie Wasserman Schultz wants to have a friendly argument with another woman about the government Shutdown, maybe she should turn to her fellow Democrat Eleanor Holmes Norton, Washington,D.C.’s representative to Congress.

Last week, Representative Norton vehemently argued with President Obama in favor of allowing the Senate to approve the Republican House’s bill to allow Washington,D.C. to use its own locally generated tax funds to run its operations until at least December 15th. The President turned her down.

As surprising as it might seem that a Democrat actually cares enough about her constituents to petition the President at a meeting full of Democrats for relief from one of his particularly destructive policies, it actually happened. Whose side would Debbie Wasserman Schultz be on if she argued with Eleanor Holmes Norton about helping her constituents? This would be a wonderful exchange to see.


37 posted on 10/14/2013 3:02:22 PM PDT by Bluestocking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

What a sexist pig she is.


39 posted on 10/14/2013 3:06:15 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

I think we all know who win if Sarah and Debbie were in the same room!
Liberal woman just aren’t the brightest bulbs in the chandelier.


41 posted on 10/14/2013 3:09:34 PM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (Under the Democrats; the Lincoln Memorial is closed; but the southern border is open)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Fluken feminazi ditz.


42 posted on 10/14/2013 3:10:00 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The Constitution is obsolete only if you see Mein Kampf or the Communist Manifesto as a replacement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

If women were not allowed to either vote or run for elected offices (as was the intention of the Founders), this would be a different (and better) country.


43 posted on 10/14/2013 3:10:10 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

She is assuming all women act like sisters. This is not the case.


44 posted on 10/14/2013 3:12:36 PM PDT by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
Not women like Wasserman.

It'd take 25 like her to figure out how to change a light bulb.

5 months would be wasted deciding on whether to use a mercury filled curly-Q bulb or the safe old kind.

45 posted on 10/14/2013 3:17:31 PM PDT by PATRIOT1876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Sounds like an outright SEXIST statement to me.

Still, it could be true, but it doesn’t sound quite right.

Here’s a test anybody can use to evaluate the accuracy of her claim.

Five guys go out to eat. How long does it take to evaluate each diner’s share of the bill?

Five women go out to eat. How long does it take to evaluate each diner’s share of the bill?

I have about forty years of casual observation that indicate the the women take significantly longer.

Restaurant waitstaff would have a more informed assessment.


47 posted on 10/14/2013 3:25:33 PM PDT by Skepolitic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

What a laugh! Women have taken over the top administrative positions where I work and the whole institution is rapidly going to hell. They only persons these women hate more than men is each other. They are more interested in trying to back stab each other than in getting anything positive accomplished. Yet, should a male offer up a solution to a problem these femmes turn on him and collectively try to destroy him. And yes, I have personal experience to support my point.


49 posted on 10/14/2013 3:26:58 PM PDT by Jay Redhawk (Oh Crap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
feh...
said the crazy cat farmer from Florida

51 posted on 10/14/2013 3:28:50 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Women don’t want to hurt anyone.

Well, Ms. WS might be jolted to take a walk into an abortion clinic, or reflect on reality.

She’s not all there.

This gang of silly people in power are going to make us look so stupid in history.

I mean natural law will prevail at one point or another.

Even health care facilities have begun disposing of drugs properly, to give people a chance to not be perpetually intoxicated.


52 posted on 10/14/2013 3:33:19 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

because “a woman doesn’t want to ruin the person on the other side of the aisle or the table.” …
..........................................................

LMAO. There are too many divorced men who have been ruined by a woman on the other side of the table to lend any credibility to this idiot remark.


53 posted on 10/14/2013 3:37:43 PM PDT by Venturer (Keep Obama and you aint seen nothing yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

omfg she’s an idiot. all she’s done the last few years is stew she’s nmot the speaker and hurl insults whenever she’s on an infotainment “media” propaganda show.

women aren’t any better. myth. think clicky, catty high school girls. yeah they all got long so well together.


54 posted on 10/14/2013 3:38:41 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
"“You know, I would argue that even if Sarah Palin were in the room, that we could find a way to get to yes, because that’s usually women’s goal,” Wasserman Schultz replied. …"

I never thought of women as a group as necessarily being easy to say "yes" ... but perhaps that's the case when you look like this ...


56 posted on 10/14/2013 4:23:11 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Depends on who those women are, you idiot. And what it is they’re supposed to “get done.”


57 posted on 10/14/2013 4:34:59 PM PDT by smalltownslick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
I've never understood why women have a difficult time with the concept of walking to the right.

Walk down a hallway and see how many women walk right in to you.

61 posted on 10/14/2013 5:06:59 PM PDT by A Cyrenian (Don't worry about stuffing the bus or filling the fridge. Try filling the Church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
Debbie Wasserman Schultz said “a woman doesn’t want to ruin the person on the other side of the aisle or the table.”


62 posted on 10/14/2013 6:04:35 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

<....”Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) said on Monday—because “a woman doesn’t want to ruin the person on the other side of the aisle or the table.”.....>

Like other Liberal Nutcases Debbie believes her own lies....that statement was a bunch of crap as she’s one ego manic when she’s ready to rip into someone. Heck her voice alone distances others and she knows it. She is and can be brutal so she’s talking out her butt on this one.


64 posted on 10/14/2013 11:19:11 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson