Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kristinn
Perhaps leaders in Washington today might consider Jefferson's description of how he and his contemporaries in the early days approached matters of interest for the new nation:

Thomas Jefferson:

"Sitting near me on some occasion of a trifling but wordy debate, he asked how I could sit in silence hearing so much false reasoning which a word should refute? I observed to him that to refute indeed was easy, but to silence impossible. That in measures brought forward by myself, I took the laboring oar, as was incumbent on me; but that in general I was willing to listen. If every sound argument or objection was used by some one or other of the numerous debaters, it was enough: if not, I thought it sufficient to suggest the omission, without going into a repetition of what had been already said by others. That this was a waste and abuse of the time and patience of the house which could not be justified. And I believe that if the members of deliberative bodies were to observe this course generally, they would do in a day what takes them a week, and it is really more questionable, than may at first be thought, whether Bonaparte's dumb legislature which said nothing and did much, may not be preferable to one which talks much and does nothing. I served with General Washington in the legislature of Virginia before the revolution, and, during it, with Dr. Franklin in Congress. I never heard either of them speak ten minutes at a time, nor to any but the main point which was to decide the question. They laid their shoulders to the great points, knowing that the little ones would follow of themselves. If the present Congress errs in too much talking, how can it be otherwise in a body to which the people send 150. lawyers, whose trade it is to question everything, yield nothing, & talk by the hour? That 150. lawyers should do business together ought not to be expected."

6 posted on 10/14/2013 7:32:46 PM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: All

“Perhaps leaders in Washington today might consider Jefferson’s description of how he and his contemporaries in the early days approached matters of interest for the new nation”

in those days, both side were god fearing, good Christian men.


16 posted on 10/14/2013 7:40:49 PM PDT by willywill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: loveliberty2

Thank you for that post.

An example of why a classical education is no longer taught:

It was a great bullshit sifter.

We sorely need more classical education. It actually taught people to think.


32 posted on 10/14/2013 8:53:38 PM PDT by Hoosier-Daddy ( "It is not our job to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson