Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obamacare website was a no-bid government contract
http://www.theblaze.com ^ | october 14, 2013 | Meredith Jessup

Posted on 10/15/2013 2:51:09 PM PDT by lowbridge

Federal officials considered only one firm to design the Obamacare health insurance exchange website that has performed abysmally since its Oct. 1 debut.

Rather than open the contracting process to a competitive public solicitation with multiple bidders, officials in the Department of Health and Human Services’ Centers for Medicare and Medicaid accepted a sole bidder, CGI Federal, the U.S. subsidiary of a Canadian company with an uneven record of IT pricing and contract performance.

CMS officials are tight-lipped about why CGI was chosen or how it happened. They also refuse to say if other firms competed with CGI, or if there was ever a public solicitation for building Healthcare.gov, the backbone of Obamacare’s problem-plagued web portal.

Instead, it appears they used what amounts to a federal procurement system loophole to award the work to the Canadian firm.

(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: healthcare; obamacare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

Opening government contracts up to competitive bidding would mean that the most efficient company would get all the contracts. Then the other companies with higher costs would go out of business, which would not only be unfair, but result in a monopoly. Since everyone agrees that competition is essential for a healthy business environment it’s necessary eliminate open bidding to preserve competition.
/sarc


21 posted on 10/15/2013 3:30:17 PM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

TWO big companies in Canada FIRED THEM BEFORE THIS FIASCO!!! WHO GOT THE MONEY???/ What SWISSS BANK ACCOUNTS did this go into??


22 posted on 10/15/2013 3:34:57 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion......the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

It is a virtual surety that whoever granted a $600 million no-bid contract,
also got a nice chunk of “thank you” under the table.


23 posted on 10/15/2013 3:37:05 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
Obama looking for a company with single payer expertise

Parent, largest Canadian tech company embedded with single payer health system in Canada

24 posted on 10/15/2013 3:40:56 PM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

mmmm-I wonder what muslim he was “appeasing”?


25 posted on 10/15/2013 3:41:11 PM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

I thought there were Federal Laws regulating vendor selection procedures.


26 posted on 10/15/2013 3:42:11 PM PDT by gitmo ( If your theology doesn't become your biography it's useless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Non competitive contracts like this can only be let in a national emergency, or if there is no known other firm that can fulfil the project requirements. The AFPI (Armed Forces Procurement Instructions) are quite clear on this. It also requires a “Finding and Determination” written by someone who has the authority for the purchase. This sounds like another little deviation from the law by the distinguished legal mind from Haaavard! More impeachable charges to add to the list. The “Buy America Act” was also conveniently discarded too I guess.


27 posted on 10/15/2013 3:46:00 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

28 posted on 10/15/2013 3:51:21 PM PDT by Libloather (The epitome of civility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

Michele Obama, Princeton ‘85, member Assoc. of Princeton Black Alumnus...presently first lady.

Toni McCall Townes-Whitley, Princeton ‘85, member Assoc. of Princeton Black Alumnus...presently Senior VP at CGI, since 2010, the prime contractor for the healthcare.gov website


29 posted on 10/15/2013 3:57:48 PM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

In this article ....

http://washingtonexaminer.com/article/2537194

found this comment .....

“Toni Townes-Whitley, Senior Vice President at CGI Federal for Civilian Agency programs, is Princeton Class of 1985. Michelle Obama is Princeton Class of 1985. Both are members of Association of Black Princeton Alumni. Ask the questions, MSM.”

Don’t know if it’s accurate/true or not ... but it makes you wonder.


30 posted on 10/15/2013 4:00:34 PM PDT by MissMagnolia (You see, truth always resides wherever brave men still have ammunition. I pick truth. (John Ransom))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parmy

BLAME CANADA!!!


31 posted on 10/15/2013 4:02:31 PM PDT by Patriot Babe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gitmo

There certainly are. And the left had a melt-down arguing that Haliburton was a sole source vendor.

My inital concern re this award was that the vendor was offshore. Subsidiary = front.


32 posted on 10/15/2013 4:13:34 PM PDT by frog in a pot ("To each according to his need..." -from a guy who never had a real job and couldn't feed his family)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
Yeah and you can probably bet your azz that it's a minority held company that has a C.E.O. who's first name starts with "La" or "De".
33 posted on 10/15/2013 4:37:48 PM PDT by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Yeller

Wonder if there is a connection between CGI Federal and CGI America?


34 posted on 10/15/2013 6:07:05 PM PDT by A_Tradition_Continues (formerly known as Politicalwit ...05/28/98 Class of '98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: A_Tradition_Continues

CGI was founded by Serge Godin in June 1976 in Québec City, Canada.[5] In 2004 CGI purchased the majority of American Management Systems (AMS), acquiring the commercial business and all government business not related to national defense. Since 2009, a subsidiary of CGI Group, CGI Federal, has been awarded over $1.4 billion in U.S. federal contracts, including an over $90 million contract by the United States Department of Health and Human Services for establishment of what would become the software back-end of the federal health insurance marketplace website.[6] In May 2010, CGI announced the acquisition of Stanley, Inc., for an enterprise value of approximately $1.07 billion.[7] In August 2010, CGI finalized the acquisition of Stanley.[8]

CGI is one of four primary Recovery Audit Contractors, established by the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, responsible for auditing region B.[9]

In May 2012 CGI agreed to acquire the UK-based computer services company Logica for £1.7 billion in cash.[10][11] The acquisition was completed on 20 August 2012.[12]

In October 2013, following the October 1, 2013, launch of open-registration for insurance under the Affordable Care Act, CGI Federal came under media scrutiny[13] after numerous issues[14] surfaced with the federal health insurance marketplace, preventing many users from logging in and signing up for insurance through the site.


35 posted on 10/15/2013 6:41:38 PM PDT by WellyP (question!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

“I’d like to know what the “loophole” might be. There is something known as a sole source justification which must be signed off on by a senior official, SES or higher. If such a sole source justification was used, a FOI request needs to be made to reveal who signed it.”

Absolutely correct! Sole source government procurements need to first prove in writing and under the scrutiny of procurement officers that research has been done thoroughly and that no other company anywhere can carry out the work specifications needed. If that’s not the case, the procurement has to go out to competitive bid. There is no doubt that hundreds of companies could have set this up.

To come to this conclusion that one is going to use a “sole source” procurement, there would have first been “requests for information” of many companies specializing in large scale software projects to get an overview of how many have descriptions, proof and referrals of having done big projects successfully. The background of the various companies’ implementation staff is also requested and reviewed. What’s needed is not really all that complicated. It probably could have been done and done well for 12 million dollars in government expenditures for the software, testing and first year implementation. The cost of all the new federal staff is separate anyway. The fact that a lot of people would theoretically sign up does not make the software more complicated. That’s a matter of speed and computer memory and interfaces.

Maybe the Obamacare system’s failing was part of the plan all along to fail and bring America to chaos. I have had a similar experience with a new online state application system having internal software failures every time one signs on.

Every uninsured person in the nation could have had his insurance paid for a tiny fraction of this horrific waste of tax-payer treasury dollars. Now we learn, on top of everything else, that all the money goes to a foreign firm. There are certainly plenty of skilled IT firms in the U.S.


36 posted on 10/16/2013 12:46:45 AM PDT by Seeing More Clearly Now (Failure seems to be Obama's job description.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson