Posted on 10/15/2013 4:02:48 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
To those people paying only casual attention, the Occupy movement has become nothing more than a footnote in history. Their ragtag encampments have been removed for the most part, and there is little to indicate they made much of an impact. In Madison, Wisconsin, however, the Occupy movement has suddenly resurfaced, but with a totally new mission: addressing the basic needs of people who are homeless.
As issues around collective bargaining rights for public employees and other significant alterations to the social contract were initiated by Governor Walker and the Republican-dominated legislature, Madison became famous for very loud and angry protests. People camped out on the Capitol grounds to the point where legislation has been passed limiting the number of people who can enter the building, and requiring a permit for any kind of gathering.
Those protests merged into the Occupy movement in Madison, although with a few unique aspects. Unlike most locations, the Madison movement had to pack up every night and move to a new place because of local ordinances. As the winter of 2011 came, it became harder and harder to hold the group together, and, it turns out, a large number of the people camping out were homeless. The homeless in Madison had realized that these camps were a place where they could get food, shelter, and a safe place for their belongings.
Now, Occupy Madison has raised funds and is working with people who are homeless to build tiny shelters in the form of 98-square-foot houses, with an eye toward creating a village of these homes with shared facilities. As word has spread about the project, donations have been flooding in. An artist from North Carolina has donated artwork to be hung in the first five that are completed. Businesses have donated a solar power system, window shades, and more.
As of now, the buildings have to be put on wheels and moved every 48 hours because of the aforementioned ordinance. The Madison Planning Commission recently recommended that the Common Council change the city zoning code to allow the buildings to be placed on the property of churches and any other organization whose mission includes helping people who are homeless. There is some debate, however, about whether this is simply a stopgap measure to deal with the homeless in lieu of creating a comprehensive policy that would address the issue.
The idea of a village of small shelters is not new. Portland, Oregon, has Dignity Village, which was established in 2001. The goal there is to create one-stop help for people seeking to make the transition back into mainstream society, offering shelter, personal hygiene, phones, an address, etc. As Occupy Madison seeks to establish a similar village in the Midwest, will this emerge as an effective way to help, or will the villages become the equivalent of the shantytowns of lean-tos, shacks, and untold poverty seen on the outskirts of many large cities around the world?
My daughter just visited Christchurch, New Zealand.
They still havne't recovered from the earthquakes from last year,and lost about 60% of their structures from the damage.
Most of the unrepairable structures and stores are multiples of welded cargo containers ,
as are many of the apartment buildings.
They do make for good temporary structures , but they are subject to rusting .
I walked out of a Home Depot store and saw a dutch barn storage shed they had there.
The dimensions of it was 10 foot by 12 foot with 7 foot sidewalls. It had a loft in it. Perfect for just me.
Basement underneath. Warm in the winter, cool in the summer
Wow.. mansion size.. I remember living in my Saturn SW1 for several months..
who needs a home? just give um a car and 15 bucks worth of gas.
I can see people doing this to remain in urban areas with lots of cultural options. To live in NY, LA or Seattle for instance.
My little “shotgun” house is 650 square feet - that’s small enough for me!
If you look at housing prices, it’s all the housing WE can afford. All the underwater mortgages meant that people were buying on credit they couldn’t truly afford. In a normal market, housing prices would self-correct, but in major metro areas, europeans and chinese, along with investment funds, are swooping into buy things. Meet our new landlords...
True Dat !
But, if you look carefully , those foreign investments may be buying ,.. but most houses remain vacant, because they can't find renters
Therefore , they will be resold soon at a loss ,.. and thus lower the overall housing costs.
Most foreigners didnt buy to lose money ,.. but with no renters , their investment is actually losing money.
The oriigninal assumption was that the foreigners would be relocating here , .. but that hasn't happened .
Going back to your original statement :"If you look at housing prices, it’s all the housing WE can afford. "
That may be true if the intent was to stay out of debt.
But most Americans are too busy" keeping up with the Kardassians" and are willing to go into debt, for 'show'
ObamaCare /Commiecare™ doesn't take into account any debts that you have, or those debts that you are paying off.
Paying off your legal debts is called ' personal responsibility' ; and if its one thing that I have learned from Zippy ,
it is that there is no such thing as Personal Responsibility or accountbility. There is always somebody else to blame for your circumstance.
However , I have a moral core,personal values ; and he does not !
Socialism and Facism absolves personal responsibility , especially if it "spreads the wealth" and it does fine ,
until it runs out of other peoples money !
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.