Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sopater

I detest the language commonly used by the perverted Left to oppose pedophilia- it’s wrong because “a child cannot consent.” Although true, it masks an unwillingness to admit a conspicuous, overarching reason - it’s just EVIL. The consent smokescreen puts the onus on the child - but for the lack of consent of the victim, the pedophile did nothing wrong - and completely ignores the existence of objective evil, something that galls the godless Left.

What happens when the definition of “consent” is, by degrees, changed? Does sex with children then, by degrees, become more viable?


54 posted on 10/19/2013 1:59:46 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fwdude
I detest the language commonly used by the perverted Left to oppose pedophilia- it’s wrong because “a child cannot consent.” Although true, it masks an unwillingness to admit a conspicuous, overarching reason - it’s just EVIL.

Excellent point.
56 posted on 10/21/2013 9:15:14 AM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson